Fungal President Joe Biden openly declared Russian President Vladimir Putin a “war criminal” in a recent outburst while speaking at NATO. He’s repeated this in the wake of the initial images coming out of the town of Bucha, Ukraine where an alleged massacre of civilians by Russian soldiers took place.
Like many incidents similar to this in the past it is hard to take any of these claims of blame seriously. The US and UK have staged many a ‘false flag’ operation in the past at convenient times to gin up diplomatic outrage to advance a particular political agenda.
That agenda is always to justify more war to deal with the villain du jour. Today it’s Putin. In the past it’s been Saddam Hussein, Slobodan Milosevic or Bashar al-Assad. The playbook is always the same. Shocking images and film of honest-to-god atrocities against civilians and an endless back and forth of accusations and suppression of real information about the event.
Sadly, that becomes the focus not the fact that civilians were murdered for political gains.
Bucha seems to fit this pattern quite well, if more crudely implemented than events like this in the past.
In this case, the censorship is nearly total to support the ‘current thing,’ in this case Bucha. But it is no different than the campaigns against certain medications to fight COVID-19.
When it comes to foreign policy objectives, there is always a common denominator in these events to frame that villain and Putin, in particular, as some evil madman… British intelligence.
From the poisoning of Sergei Skripal, to the downing of MH-17 over Ukraine, to the ammonia gas attack in Douma, at the center of these allegations is always some arm of the Brits.
All the roads to RussiaGate lead through Ukraine and British Intelligence. At some point you just have to face the face of the agitator. Every one of those stories have logical inconsistencies wide enough to drive a column of tanks through.
These are painstakingly worked through by investigative journalists pushed to the fringe by the technocrats’ willing partners in Silicon Valley to minimize their influence over the narrative.
That, in itself, should be considered prima facia evidence of malfeasance but sadly it isn’t.
From the moment Russia’s troops crossed the border into Ukraine on February 24th there has been a clear strategy by the Russian Ministries of Defense and Foreign Affairs to head off potential false flags publicly before they could be pulled off.
The Russian Foreign Ministry singled out the UK for its histrionics saying if they wanted to lead the charge, they’ll get the worst treatment.
With the pullout of Russian troops from around Kiev however, they have little control over the preparing of the stage. You believe what you want to believe about Bucha, I don’t care.
Given the track record of Russia’s accusers here I’m taking the position that these allegations have to be incontrovertibly proven publicly for me to believe a word of them. Here’s one version of the story (warning: very graphic).
That is how low the credibility of the sources on this are. The UK government has been, along with Biden’s Dept. of State and National Security Council, the most belligerent in their response to Russia’s military operation. Their history and naked hatred of all things Russian stretches back multiple centuries.
In short, they have motive, means and opportunity to stage a false flag to push public sentiment further towards NATO’s intervention into Ukraine officially, therefore a false flag is the most likely scenario.
Complaints about how Russia waged the initial part of this war have centered on their unwillingness (but not opposition) to target civilians. Kiev could have easily been taken if the Russians wanted to commit massive atrocities against civilians.
They did not do so. That flies in the face of what’s being alleged about Bucha. That doesn’t mean it didn’t happen the way it is being alleged, but the burden of proof lies with the accuser (Ukraine) and their allies (The US and UK).
And the main amplifier of this story, the UK, blocked not one but two proposals by the Russian Federation to investigate what happened in Bucha. We can’t have that, there’s a war to escalate.
Remember this story is only possible because the Russians first got repulsed from taking Kiev and then pulled back from the areas surrounding it. They are redeploying forces and regrouping for a major push against Ukrainian forces trapped in the eastern part of Ukraine.
That operation will likely wipe out what’s left of the UAF troops there and push the next phase of this war on the ground to its natural state of equilibrium for the next few months.
There are so many people whose crimes in Ukraine would be exposed by a Russian win there that it is truly existential to keep that from happening. It goes deeper than even the ideology of the West which needs to subjugate Russia if the Davos plan for global governance is going to have any hope of succeeding.
This is also personal for everyone from Joe Biden himself to hundreds, if not thousands of people complicit in the various schemes, plots and crimes committed in the petrie dish of corruption they’ve staged their attacks on common decency from.
So, when I say they have motive, means and opportunity, I mean it. These are the same people who impeached Donald Trump over a phone call. Of course they will say the quiet parts out loud about what they want to do to Putin for screwing up their grand plans.
This brings me back to my article from the other day handicapping the Hungarian elections. Because Hungary is now in a very strong position I posited they’d be in if Viktor Orban won the election, which he did, emphatically. And that means the EU is in a very precarious position to continue supporting an anti-Russia policy stance.
With a fiscally, monetarily (they are not on the euro) and energy independent Hungary there is little argument for them staying in the EU if Brussels is going to treat them as second class members. Orban and his government have been resolute in their refusal to get involved in the Russia/Ukraine conflict even though there has been serious pressure applied by NATO.
In anticipation of any resistance to the EU’s new set of draconian and frankly insane sanctions on Russia the European Commission wasted no time in announcing they are beginning ‘rule of law’ procedures against Hungary to cut them out of any monetary distributions within the bloc.
The European Commission will soon trigger a powerful new mechanism to cut funding to Hungary for eroding the bloc’s rule-of-law standards, Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said Tuesday.
The announcement comes two days after Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán won a fourth consecutive term in an election that international observers said was marred by an uneven playing field benefiting the ruling Fidesz party…
… Von der Leyen said her team informed Hungary of its decision on Tuesday after reviewing Budapest’s responses to an informal letter the Commission sent last November asking for information on its rule-of-law concerns.
“We’ve carefully assessed the result of these questions,” von der Leyen said, speaking to the European Parliament. “Our conclusion is we have to move on [to] the next step.”
There’s nothing ‘careful’ about the EU’s assessment here. Hungary and Poland were forced to accept these new rules in a major political battle with the EU in 2021 over their Green New Deal. He wasn’t in a strong enough position to stop this and it meant then we would wind up here today if he won re-election.
The EC’s formal charges against Hungary over their furry law is just like other such moves, namely against Poland for its hated Supreme Court recall law. They are forcing the ultimate choice on Hungary because all the EU really has is Article 7 censure and expulsion from the Union as a threat.
The amount of money they are holding as a carrot to Orban in COVID relief funds is just 30 pieces of silver and he knows it.
So, if you play this out to the end, this is where Orban has to go. He must force the EU to do what Mark Rutte said last month, kick them out or back down.
Today the European Commission is staring at the real threat: that Hungary has no intention of going along with the new sanctions and Orban actually welcomes Von der Leyen’s move to censure and cut off Hungary’s funds from the EU budget.
They will be a country that now pays in but gets nothing in return other than the stick.
But as long as they are a member of the European Commission they can and will veto anything else Von der Leyen cooks up to punish Russia with as a political cudgel to beat vulnerable EU members into going along with.
The EC thinks they will be making an example of Hungary but what they will really be doing is giving Orban an even stronger hand to play on the European Council. Now he can stay in Budapest and tell Hungarians that the EU no longer works for Hungarians and they would be better off free from their yoke.
Hung-exit, anyone?
Elections have consequences when you don’t control the outcome of them. This is why the neocons and war criminals like Hillary Clinton, Lindsey Graham and Joe Biden are all screaming that something or someone has to do something to stop Putin whose operation in Ukraine still has the potential to expose everything.
It’s why Bucha was so haphazardly staged and ham-fistedly packaged up to us.
The blow out results in Hungary on Sunday were a major blow to EU confidence and solidarity. Twelve years of calling Orban a Nazi while supporting real 4th generation Nazis in Ukraine landed with a whimper.
Von der Leyen is a certifiable idiot for invoking the ‘rule of law’ weapon against Orban here using the alleged events at Bucha. She’s using it as an excuse to purposefully destroy the European economy per the directive of her Davos handlers. Their calculus is simple, burn the entire global economy down to punish Putin, Xi and everyone else not down with the Comintern.
It exposes the EU’s complicity in the war on Russia as willing partners with the US and UK because if they wanted to continue virtue signaling they would propose crazy new sanctions and let Hungary veto them.
But now we can only conclude this is exactly what they wanted.
That puts things into stark relief as we look ahead to the increasingly likely probability that French President Emmanuel Macron loses to Marine LePen in France who would be in a far stronger position to break up EU solidarity, freezing it politically at a time when Europe’s financial vulnerability has never been higher.
Meanwhile Putin keeps saying “Got Gold or Rubles?” and Orban is preparing a cold dish of political revenge on the nastiest people in Europe. When this mouse roars, they may finally have to listen.
Join my Patreon if you don’t want to be a war criminal
Can Orban really veto all new EU sanctions against Russia?
If Le Pen upsets Macron in France Davos will go into meltdown like a nuclear reactor.
Davos will be in full steal mode regarding this French election. To which the following observation may well apply. “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”
France is the strong hold of the Dynasty. They are not going to allow Marine LePen to win. No matter what it takes. That is why they are covertly backing that new “conservative” to split the vote, and keep their puppet Macron in power.
Unless of course the Davosians are on the brink of a controlled demolition of Europe, in which case patsies like Le Pen (and enemies like Orban) can be allowed/placed into national leadership so that when it all collapses they get the blame, we beg for global governance and the Davosians can offer us their Great Reset.
Of course there will still be a need for European representation at the Global Council table, and Merkel and Macron will have clean hands at that point….?
A similar manufactured collapse of our fiat currencies is underway of course – just a question of which central bankers shoulder the blame for that (it sure won’t be Carney, Draghi, Bernanke etc)
He can, but the European Commission has a way to get around that – some kind of arcane, bizarre foobar conceived by a French scam expert 50 years ago which is hiding somewhere in the millions of pages of the “acquis communautaire”. Mind you, the exceptions are only there to be applied to noncore member states. I don’t think that Orban will exercise his veto right though, the Hungarian political class is far too intelligent to do that.
As a former resident of France, I’ve been watching French politics for decades. This happens EVERY time: Hope rises for some sort of deliverance from business as usual–and when the votes are counted, the establishment candidate is declared the winner. Very unfortunately, LePen has NO hope against Macron.
That is my base case but the numbers look different this time Will. I don’t expect miracles but I won’t cut myself off from the possibility. These are different times than the past
Having fled from that country of unquestioning arrogant conformist beta cucks decades ago, I agree with you 110%… even if (as Tom Luango indicates) the situation is a bit different this time. It would take an unusual wave of support for LePen to overcome the (more than likely) globalist controlled outcome of the French elections. Such a wave is unlikely. The fate of the French was sealed decades ago when they overwhelmingly chose to be invaded by Islam as well as ever increasingly embrace their cherished pacifistic pseudo-intellectual socialist “ideals” and rebuked their traditions, customs and patriotism. They are an unthinking, weak, degenerate, emasculated people willing to trade all their freedoms for security. It’s a shame, France was once a country to reckon with…but that was a long time ago.
Hopefully people are finally waking up to the nonsense being perpetrated or understanding that they are charlie brown, and their politicians are like lucy with the football.
Hung-exit? I like that. Almost as much as I would enjoy seeing Ursula von der Leyen, Emmanual Macron, Frau Merkel and Justin Castro (oops…Trudeau) being the ones hung up like bad wallpaper.
And don’t get me started on Dr Evil personified (Klaus Schwab). I think the best result would be for Ursula den Hag (the Hag; nothing to do with the Hague) to tell Orban to go away from the EU. His successes are the mirror of her failures.
Regarding the British “Intelligence” criminal acts: Their failures may start World War 3. I’m surprised that the CCP Virus that their homegrown hemmorrhoid Peter Daszak helped propagate along with Dr Fausci shows that they are the true war criminals. And it seems my spell-check is telling me I made a bunch of spelling errors in the last sentence, but who cares? Their form of “intelligence” is lying to the rest of the world.
The final irony: The Biden regime telling everyone in advance about Russian false flags. That’s something that gets revealed after the fact; and they were too dumb to know even that! As usual, they told us what they were going to do by saying that their enemies were the ones doing it.
Poor old Orban is about to shoulder some blame, along with the Davosian patsies.
Because when you’re about to crash the Titanic into an iceberg, it makes sense to leave your enemy in the Crow’s Nest.
Macron might be about to get in a lifeboat however – maybe they’ll put Le Pen in charge of lifejackets.
You just keep repeating the same thing over and over again, it is unbelievable how hooked you are on this B horror movie line. So sad!
Yes. Welcome to Ivor’s Dementia
Yes, I realize it can seem a bit repetitious – fitting emerging events into a central theory often requires a certain amount of restating of that theory Just as each apparent setback to the Davosian plan requires Tom to repeatedly assert that the Davosians are merely overambitious Eurotrash, desperately shooting for the moon?
This merely suggests that Tom and I both have theories that have survived a certain amount of contact with real-world events, and although Tom insists that my theory (that the Davosians are on the brink of successfully collapsing the current monetary and geopolitical order and imposing a global currency and technogulag) closely resembles dementia, I would argue that the last decade of co-ordinated currency debauchment and the last few years of plandemic vaccine passports suggest that the Davosians are well along in their plans, and that it is Tom’s theory that looks increasingly at odds with events on the ground.
Of course I hope that I’m wrong – watching these Davosian creatures crash and burn as Tom predicts would fill me with grim joy.
But from my chair, Tom’s confidence looks increasingly misplaced.
And hope is not a strategy.
According to you Orban,M.Le Pen, Putin, Xi and anybody of power is a Davos agent, all trying to trick us into GR. Right? You are really (and sadly) becoming a laughing stock here on this forum.
I don’t claim they are Davos agents, trying to trick anyone. Although I’m suspicious about Draghi, Macron, Obama and Merkel.
Orban and Le Pen are their enemies, but of no value to them. They will just carry the can for Europe’s collapse. Putin and Xi are those they hope to turn into allies, with sticks or carrots – I believe they have been invited to the global governance table. Offered a choice to join or die.
I think Xi has agreed. Putin appears to be resisting, for now. Maybe.
And the admiration of strangers on the internet isn’t really a currency I strive to acquire – I’m more interested in seeing interesting ideas and discussing them with people whose analytical abilities I respect.
And although I think that Tom has a flaw in his key premise, his analysis of world events is excellent, and really helps me broaden/correct my own thinking.
The real joy is knowing that if he’s right, the blow to my ego will be tempered massively by watching the Davosians fail horribly.
And watching evil die will be compensation aplenty.
There is also a group of people whom Zelensky is a part of who are now laughing and dancing in circles as the Russians and Slav Ukrainians are dying in what they perceive as “their land” let’s be honest about it.
Some say Luisitania was false flag….some say purposeful bad judgement.
https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/sinking-lusitania/
The Lusitania was full of cannon shells (there are plenty of dive wreckage photos) but the British had the effrontery to later claim that the ship carried no munitions…get this…because the fuses had not been screwed on. Talk about false flags!- where you kill your own civilians !
No, it wasn’t full of munitions. The Lusitania was a coal-powered ship. At the end of its voyage across the Atlantic, its coal bunkers were almost empty and filled with coal dust. When the torpedo exploded, it ignited the dust causing a second massive explosion which blew out the ship’s side. It sank very quickly because the ship continued to sail on which accelerated the water ingress. Robert Ballard carried out a detailed exploration of the wreck (see “Exploring the Lusitania: probing the mysteries of the sinking which changed history”). The Captain of the Lusitania thought that he was safe by sailing close to the Irish coast. What he didn’t know was that there was a pack of U-Boats on the hunt in these waters, and that, despite the Royal Navy knowing this because it had broken the German naval ciphers, no RN ships were covering this area.
Hi Sheryl,
You might be interested in this as to why the United States entered the First World War, it was something I didn’t know:
Prof Michael HUDSON – De-Dollarization – Toward the End of U.S. Monetary Hegemony?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbWaNPAS39s&t=1237s
JP Morgan went to the White House and explained to President Woodrow Wilson, that if the UK lost the war to Germany, the UK would take the American banking system down with it because of all of the money that had been lent to the UK for arms purchases.
Furthermore, the UK wanted America to enter the war because it was the normal practice for the European powers to forgive war debts accrued by the winners. Thus England wanted to bring America in for debt cancellation reasons.
So there were huge economic & financial reasons to get involved in that war.
However, we are taught that America entered the war because of the German practice of “unrestricted submarine warfare” sinking American ships:
Why did the US enter World War I?
https://www.rochester.edu/newscenter/looking-back-100-years-u-s-enters-world-war-i-on-april-6-1917/
I feel so stupid sometimes. (sigh)
If Tom were blogging in 1917, his pre-War blog headline would have been: “JP Morgan meets Woodrow Wilson in Washington” while the rest of the media would have had headlines about the “Number of American merchant ships sunk in the Atlantic”. (lol)
I feel so privileged that we all ended up here on Tom’s blog. It is like having an inside, front row seat to history being made. IMHO
The German government bought ads in American newspapers to tell people not to sail to England because of unrestricted submarine warfare and the trafficking of arms on civilian ships. Also of interest is the Zimmerman telegram, also reported on by British Intel.
Establishing yourself in a country you wish to control and coming in and taking over during a crisis is nothing new, Machiavelli wrote about it in The Prince. Problem is how ham fisted and poorly executed false flags have become coming from the west, and how immensely shitty the western political class is. Nobody cares about false flags if they are still content. Something about propaganda pushing people into self-castration and immigration used as a tool of genocide might have to do with the waking up to the tactic of the false flag/orchestrated incident but it is an ancient trick that will never go away and the Russians and Chinese will inevitably use similar tactics.
Russia’s defeat by starting a war in Ukraine is arguably an instance of this: they made ties with the LDNR but held back officially recognizing probably waiting for some sort of legitimate crisis that they could control occured and gave them the excuse to invade. They lost because they couldn’t wait that long. However, they still did, in a ham fisted way use the same tactic by recognizing the LDNR and declaring the shelling of civilians in Donbass and supposed imminent threat of war (probably true honestly) started by the Ukrainians to justify their invasion, which paired with the evidence of biological weapons labs they have sized will build them a great case in international courts. That is why the war will likely only ever end in armistice (cease fire), because if the war officially ended the United States would have to explain to the world in a court why it was funding Ukrainian development of WMDs.
“… the United States would have to explain to the world in a court why it was funding Ukrainian development of WMDs..” – this is a good joke. Similar joke like Ukrainian soldiers killed all the Butcha people to finally accuse Russia for the massacre.
I get why you’re anti-Davos but I fail to see how being a proponent of dictatorial regimes aligns with your Libertarian values. Perhaps you or one of your readers who knows the difference between a spell check and grammar check can help me see how they are compatible.
They aren’t compatible. I’m not analyzing the world from the position of what I want. I’m analyzing the world I’ve got. It’s a hard thing to separate who you are from what you want and see the bigger picture.
War is horrific and unacceptable. But if it’s inevitable and those pushing for it want to use it to install a system over me that is tyrannical then I’m happy to cheer on anyone that gums up that process.
In this case I can see how Putin’s actions in Ukraine serve the larger goal of disempowering those people. Since I’m also quite sure that he has no imperial designs on my life then I’m happy yo root for him to fuck over these Davosian asshats.
Once he’s done doing that then I’m happy to lambaste him for being an authoritarian jackass.
Order of operations matter. So do principles.
This is why Riley’s position in the debate from last week was unconvincing. He was arguing the world he wanted, not the world he had and refused to see the nuances of how to get from the latter to the former.
Hi Tom,
I understand now, thanks to you, the significance of the LIBOR -> SOFR transition and due that it looks like the WEFs plans have gone seriously off the rails.
However, who is supporting this war, because it looks like the EU is going to get obliterated here and end up completely beholden to the United States in terms of energy, arms and foreign policy? And that seems completely the opposite of Schwab’s aims.
With the LIBOR -> SOFR narrative, I understand how the pandemic was directed against the Fed, but this War seems like it is directed against the EU?
Is the war an anachronistic holdover from Hudson’s Super Imperialism rubric? Powell seems to have abandoned that by saying there could be more than one reserve currency.
It just seems like there are now two overlapping discordant scripts in play?
And at this point, if the EU/WEF doesn’t exit this conflict soon, it is going to get crushed. Yet they seem to be going along with the US/NATO and are inexplicably ratcheting up the pressure on Putin.
Do you have any idea?
They are going scorched earth in the hopes of winning by forcing everyone else to lose. It will just end badly
I think that if you assume (as Tom does) that the Davosians are merely Eurotrash, then their willingness to sacrifice Europe (staffing it with enemies and imbeciles so you can sink it) will be a baffling development.
Whereas if you understand that the Davosians want global governance and a global currency and therefore NEED Europe (and America, and Britain, and Russia, and all our currencies) to utterly fail, then their willingness to sacrifice/destroy them all will instead make perfect sense.
But surely that’s precisely the sort of pragmatic realpolitikal thinking that enables Davosians to justify their actions too (“let’s impose global tyranny in order to resolve global inequality, and then worry about restoring freedom afterwards”), and for people to accept the curtailment of essential liberties in exchange for security? Doing deals with the devil is always unwise, and moral courage is often about taking the pain.
Voting for Trump to avoid the Hildebeast might be pragmatic, but denouncing both is the way to retain your integrity.
“For what does it profit a man….”
Great reply. Couldn’t have said it better myself. Bravissimo!
Well stated Tom; “The Enemy of My Enemy is My Friend.” And right now Putin standing alongside Xi and India are probably the best hope we got. To those Americans that think we can defeat the Globalist cabal with our 2nd amendment I applaud your bravado if you are indeed serious should that time come. In fact, I will join you in victory or death. But if Russia and China can’t beat these bastards we got our work cut out for us….just sayin!!
A Monarch’s country is his private property. All people who hold property have interest in seeing the value of that property be maintained or improved, so a monarch has incentive to see his kingdom improved. How do you improve your kingdom? Allowing your citizens to be productive in a relatively free market (while protecting your political power through force of arms of course).
An oligarchy does not own a country but owns parts of a country and maintains power by it’s ownership of whatever share of the country it has. In order to maintain power then, oligarchs have to prevent economic competition or else somebody might out compete them and take their share of the country and thus their power, so they need to suppress economic liberty.
The same can be said of memetic production as it concerns free speech. An oligarchy who controls the media has power by dominating memetic production, so it needs to limit free speech or else get out competed by superior memes. A monarch, again, holds ultimate veto on everything so greater freedom of memetic production will be allowed.
There are only two types of power, monarchic and oligarchic.
Anarchy is a fantasy, power always fills a void.
Therefore if you want to maximize real freedom, Monarchs/dictators/strong men will always give you more real freedom than democracies which are ultimately window dressing for oligarchies.
Tom probably doesn’t agree with 100% of that but it is largely the truth and as a result Russians are more free under the strongman V. V. Putin than Americans are under the American oligarchy, and that is a fact.
I agree that Monarchies are far stronger than Democracies. Hoppe’s book, “Democracy, the God That Failed” made this point
“…Monarchies are far stronger than Democracies..”, but obviously by far not as successful as Democracies. Only exception today is China. The future will show whether the corrupt political elite here is sustainable.
False flags, propaganda and bunkem are one thing. The real problem is that so many believe them.
The suckers are being lured to their deaths. Evolution is in action and although some perceive themselves as having such, no one has the ability to choose the winners.
It will be interesting for the survivors to see, which human traits and attributes will prevail.
My opinion is that, those we call the elites have no hardship friends and will, I hope, if circumstances change, turn on and destroy each other. So hang in there. It ain’t a done deal yet.
“Even the best laid plans ….”
Cheers.
There doesn’t seem to be a way to select ‘Notify me of new comments via email’ without also making a comment … hence this comment which is unrelated to the subject.
To live with our enemies as if they may some time become our friends, and to live with our friends as if they may some time become our enemies, is not a moral but a political maxim…said somebody.
“He was arguing the world he wanted, not the world he had and refused to see the nuances of how to get from the latter to the former“
I would say he was arguing the world as he see’s it. Which is one in Russia of QR codes, medical passports and mandatory vaccination. What difference does it make if putie is the second coming for all of humanity, just a degenerate billionaire jockeying for position, or a new global leader playing his role in the kabuki theater? The reality on the ground is the same. Our future is bleak.
Martin Armstrong blog a book to read just before his Nov. conference in US 2021, called
Pox Americana:The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Anne Fenn. I have read it and your knowledge of again very important info that is not in the history books will amaze you. Her footnotes and documentation is impeccable, and she makes a very good case for the European Spanish soldiers who first came to South America brought smallpox with them and when you see her proof of how lethal this disease is, it is a very good explanation of the wipeout of the Aztecs , Incas, and many Native American tribes. STRONGLY READ IT!!
I found it rather unsettling that lots of these countries and institutions were clamoring for their citizens to take just one dose of the shot. It’s as if if they know that that’s all they need people to take to get their desired effects. The war crimes and various atrocities won’t hold a candle to the world wide mass poisoning that’s occurred.
Postcript: Note to Alex Krainer….Ms. Fenn’s book found documentation in her research of
Russian traders/fishermen in Alaska in 18th century of enslavement, and horrific abuse of the Native indigenous peoples. There is evil in all nationalities. Early Americans enslaved Africans
but not the Native Americans due to European demand for beaver pelts. In return natives traded those pelts for guns, bullets and horses, guns coming from Europe.
UK hates Russia ? Interesting only that Londongrad is the most popular city for rich russians in the world. Russia could have been able to take easily control of Kiev ? Hmmm, so easy as they took control of Mariupol I guess. Just destroy everything with rockets. That’s obviousIy the only way Russia can get control. Where is Russia’s famous secret service and this very dangereous Russian troll army, manipulating elections worldwide ? Are they not able to create a regime change in the Ukraine without war ? Obviously not. Or is Russia simply considering the Ukrainians as the jews2.0 which have to be destroyed to present a cleaned Ukraine2.0 ? Hmmm, obviously …. I guess you havn’t read Dugin’s books and papers in detail. Then you can easily see who are the real nazis in this conflict.
Sorry to tell you mate, but those Russians in London are about as Russian as the Russians in Brighton Beach (the Brooklyn one). In other words, they hate Jesus Christ. And you should know that the Jews in Ukraine were cleansed by the very same people who are now fighting the Russians and their Eastern Ukrainian brethren.
Go back to the guy in charge of whatever troll farm you were hired to be a part of and tell him to dock your pay until you can flesh out a better way to shill. Nobody should be paying for d&c of quality this low.
Lest we forget….7 ountries in five years…
https://www.salon.com/2007/10/12/wesley_clark/
The UK does hate Russia. When Tzar Paul with Napolean put grand plans together to rid India of the British and the East India Company in the late 1700’s, The British sent one of their ambassadors to assasinate the Tzar in Saint Petersberg, Russia (in his own country no less) and were successful in the assasination of the Tzar. The Russians also helped the American fledgling colony repeatedly against the British trying to regain their foot hold in their lost American colony during the American war of Independence, the war of 1812 and again during the Civil war which was also a British war of annexation that nobody has cared to figure out as yet. For all this, the British have never forgiven the Russians.
The mayor of Bucha proudly announced the orderly withdrawal of Russian troops on 30 March. A few days later, the alleged Russian atrocities were discovered. Why it took so long to notice all the dead bodies littering the streets is a mystery.
Perhaps these were actually Azov (Nazi) reprisal killings of (ethnic Russian) Ukrainians who had cooperated with Russian troops. Just sayin’
Go back to the guy in charge of whatever troll farm you were hired to be a part of and tell him to dock your pay until you can flesh out a better way to shill. Nobody should be paying for d&c of quality this low.
Hi Tom,
I found this quite interesting, from 2014:
Profiting Without Producing: How Finance Exploits Us All — A lecture by Costas Lapavitsas
From what I can tell, Costas Lapavitsas, is Left-wing, Euro-Skeptic, Greek economist, who wants Greece out of the EU and a returned to the Drachma. With those positions he does not appear to be a WEF guy but is definitely a Marxist.
And like most Marxist’s he can see the ills of society, however, his solution is this:
THE ELIMINATION OF COMMERCIAL / PRIVATE BANKING:
https://youtu.be/6GoQWkyVZq4?t=3334
And there it is!
So, maybe we need to look the war as a stress test of the commercial banking system verses the WEF controlled nation states? And we (the people of the world) are no more than incidental collateral damage to the greater financial struggle going on.
While I am no fan of Wall Street driven financialization, the WEF/Davos position “you will own nothing and be happy” strikes me as incredibly dystopian, Orwellian and sinister. And it would appear that both Russia & China want no part of it.
IMHO
Yes, they want the end of banking intermediaries. The problem isn’t banks per se, it is government which grants banks privileges which grow out of control
It’s just part of the cycle. The lesson of this cycle will be to take money and credit creation out of the hands of government and banks
I recall we discussed this before, and you predicted that Wall St would not allow themselves to be disintermediated, whereas I predicted that the IMF or BIS would create direct accounts into which our UBI would be paid.
Are you now worrying that disintermediation might actually happen, or just agreeing with AnonX that the Chinese and Russians would not be sad to see the end of Wall St?
AFAIK, Russia has no motive to massacre civilians. Nazis talk about genocide a lot.
Hi Kevin Scott Ritter said just that on a 2hr Duran video yesterday
Like you, I am struck by how unimaginative the neocons are with their gambits. LIke a chess player who always works the Dutch Defense with minor variations, they do the same moves. Probably because it’s worked so well. Like a media corporation that has made giant piles of money by making films out of old 1960s comics, they just keep hammering the same theme until they can’t imagine doing it any other way. But like Super hero moves, the Color Revolution Game is no longer a sure fire winner. Competitors are onto the game. And the Dutch Defense can be beaten by a player who has studied your game. Putin tried to play the globo-homo game by the WEF rules and they elbowed him in the eye for his trouble. If you were Kissinger, you’d be thinking that we’re seeing a case of Robert Kagan letting his emotions get in the way of smooth operation. THis is what people are accusing Putin of. But Putin planned his moves out far better than, say, the Japanese. (Who were emotionally incapable of cutting a deal with the Soviet Union) When you’re playing for high stakes against psychopaths, human emotion is only useful for the final flourish when you stick the knife in.
Well, one cannot help but wonder whether Nuland’s reported comments* are apocryphal, but even if they are, one can plagiarize the old aphorism “Many a true word spoke in jest” here.
Is it the palpable threat to the “(no) rules-based order” posed by the multpolar rules-based order, (‘The Global South’), which in turn implies the end of the US/Israeli global hegemon, the underlying driver of all the eardrum-splitting madness shrieking at us from the state pulpits and the halls of Valhalla (EU)?
*from Twitter – BREAKING NEWS: US State department officials leak that when asked about potential starvation in the EU due to the Russia sanctions Victoria Nuland responded “and what part of that is a bad thing?”
If people want to read up on subjects like the Skripal incident , MH17 etc. here are a few sites to check out-
http://johnhelmer.net/
https://www.moonofalabama.org/
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/
Craig Murray is good.
Have a look at the photo of the Skripals taken the day of their poisoning – the one where they are raising their glasses.
In the mirror behind them you can partly see their poisoner reflected.
I suspect his initials are PM, for any that know the history.
This is the ” humanitarian equipment” Russians brought to war in Ukraine.
No translation required.
Just watch and think. What would they use it for?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6L0jiMloO8&t=119s
I dedicate it with special regards to Tom.
Looks like a good way to get rid of those nasty biological toxins Nuland so kindly told us were sitting in Hunter Bidens biolabs dotted around Ukraine.
CogitoMan:
When viewing the news I found this to be very helpful, it is old but still applies, IMHO:
THE THREE LEVELS OF INFORMATION
Prof. Anthony Sutton, Economist, Stanford University, Hoover Institution:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXWsv_qPGwU&t=279s
LEVEL 1: What they want you to know. Only coincidentally is it the truth. Criteria: “What do we want them to know and is it consistent with what we told them last time?” eg, CNN, WaPo, NYT, MSNBC, FNC, etc.
LEVEL 2: An analysis of the first level of information for contradictions and inconsistencies. eg, Joe Rogan, Tucker Carlson, Jimmy Dore, Tim Pool, Russel Brand, etc.
LEVEL 3: Primary source documents: Wikileaks, Snowden, Pentagon Papers, Climate Gate Emails, Hunter Biden Laptop, Sealed Pfizer Clinical Trial Data… etc. Glen Greenwald, Matt Taibbi, Aaron Maté, Andrei Nekrasov, etc.
It usually takes about 3-7 days to reach Level 2, in regard to any particular story, thanks to the 4-Chan sleuths and the internet:
Viral “Russian Mobile Crematorium” Tweet Is From An 8-Year-Old YouTube Video
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/viral-russian-mobile-crematorium-tweet-8-year-old-youtube-video
And here is a rather innocuous version of the same thing:
Media shows why it’s so mistrusted after falsified Trump fish-feeding ‘story’
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/358983-media-shows-why-its-so-mistrusted-after-falsified-trump-fish-feeding/
And this is about how such media manipulations are done, with many examples:
Media Manipulation Tricks Exposed
https://westernman.org/media-manipulation
So, while our hearts might be in the right place, you have to keep in mind that TPTB don’t consider the average person to be worthy of the truth and instead are seen as pawns and chumps that can be played to further an agenda. If you want want the truth, you have to really work for it.
“People don’t have ideas. Ideas have people.” ― Carl Jung
This is how Russians try to conquer Ukraine…
Czernobyl is the place where Fukushima type event took place in 1986.
Many say that Czernobyl is much more radioactive than Fukushima.
Hundreds of people lost their lives trying to contain blown up atomic reactor at that time.
Thousands died later.
Since then this area is totally excluded from public access.
Only Ukrainian specialists in hazmat gear were allowed to go in to control the state of power plant and its surroundings.
So called “Red Forrest” is the place most contaminated with radioactive fallout.
But Russian soldiers were more afraid of Ukrainians that some puny radioactivity.
So they dug trenches and lived there ….for like a month.
Now there are news that about 200 soldiers were evacuated to Bielarus hospital with acute radioactive poisoning.
They lost the war with radioactivity and left the zone completely.
Several have died already.
https://www.msn.com/pl-pl/wiadomosci/polska/szokuj%C4%85ce-informacje-z-czarnobyla-ukrai%C5%84cy-pokazali-zdj%C4%99cia-i-nagranie-z-czerwonego-lasu-co-z-promieniowaniem-w-polsce/ar-AAVXgaG?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=28ea442d83144e03a9aa80a56046f4c9
Article is in Polish so use google webpage translate if you want to read it in English
He he he….
This is how Ukrainians “honoured” Muslim Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov that helps Putin with war on Ukraine.
https://www.o2.pl/informacje/hodowcy-trzody-zakpili-z-kadyrowa-tak-nazwali-nowa-rase-swin-6755591008963200a?utm_source=msn&utm_medium=referral
Partial translation
“We did not think long about the name of the breed. The first breeding boar bred by us, which is now the main boar of the family, has a beard and fangs, and was named Ramzan, and all pigs of this breed were called Kadyrov pigs, respectively,” explained the breeder, quoted by the portal swiatrolnika.info.”
When you realise it is a battle ‘royal’ from the British establishment (royal family) the solution is clear. Destroy the British crown and a lot of things will resolve.