Since the day she announced she wouldn’t be running for re-election in 2020 I knew Tulsi Gabbard was distancing herself from the Democratic Party for a potential Presidential run in 2024.
Gabbard is supposed to be everything the Democrats want. A strong, ‘progressive’ female of ‘color’ who backed Bernie Sanders’ runs for the nomination, implying she’s a useful Commie. She was groomed early on as a WEF Future Leader and put on important House Committees which landed her default invitations to CFR meetings, while also being a member of the Democratic National Committee.
It was clear she was being schmoozed by the DNC and Davos to become a major player from the moment she was first elected to Congress in 2012.
But something happened on the way to Gabbard’s ascension to the top of the U.S. political scene, her conscience got the better of her. I’ve followed Gabbard for years and watched her carefully, knowing full well about her past associations with Davos.
Now, for the New Statesman to run a schlocky piece about her as a GOP Dark Horse last week at a pivotal moment in the shifts in Congress against the Democrats’ domestic policy is telling of just how scared the Democrats and Davos are of the 2024 vote getting split along populist lines.
She’s fostered a cult of personality among her supporters, who either refuse to acknowledge that Gabbard holds right-wing positions or, more often, go on to adopt those positions themselves. Lately, Gabbard’s pivot to cancel-culture pundit, complete with undertones of worries about anti-white “racism”, has inspired her followers to take on the same pet issues. They’ve gone from iconoclastic left-leaning upstarts to “American patriots” without a blink.
And here I thought she was a Davos stalking horse to lead stupid libertarians away from the GOP because she’s hawt and anti-war?
It gets so confusing to keep the narrative straight anymore, but, asking for consistency from the loony left is like asking Joe Biden to remember what he had for breakfast yesterday,
The rest of the article is nothing more than a hit piece to smear Gabbard through guilt-by-association to keep control over the soccer mom set from jumping from the sinking ship that is the Democratic Party. It’s that same ship Gabbard was two years ahead of everyone else in leaving I remind you.
The Populism Problem is that it’s Popular
Remember, folks, populists are the new Nazis in the New Normal and everyone not ‘down with the Commintern’ has to be painted with that brush as often as possible.
The Department of Justice just told us this is the case. They’ve created a new specialized unit to combat ‘Domestic Terrorism’ which amounts to spending non-existent tax money on investigating and intimidating pretty much anyone reading this blog post.
This response from the DoJ is just part of the fallout from the false flag operation that was January 6th, 2021. Even a milquetoast like Jonathan Turley can see what’s happening here and is now concerned about it.
The Democrats know they have zero chance of retaining the House or the Senate in the fall and what they are doing now is using 1/6 as the means by which to limit who can and cannot run for office this fall and beyond.
If you can’t win at the ballot box then create a permanent arm of the bureaucracy to stifle dissent. It’s the new version of “nuts and sluts,” folks. I wrote about this during the Kavanaugh hearings.
“Nuts and Sluts” is easy to understand. Simply accuse the person you want to destroy of being either crazy (the definition of which shifts with whatever is the political trigger issue of the day) or a sexual deviant.
This technique works because it triggers most people’s Disgust Circuit, a term created by Mark Schaller as part of what he calls the Behavioral Immune System and popularized by Johnathan Haidt.
The disgust circuit is also easy to understand.
It is the limit at which behavior in others triggers our gut-level outrage and we recoil with disgust.
So, today there are multiple political issues conflated to create one big tent under which to house all the challengers to Davos and the demons running the DNC. From being unvaccinated against COVID-9/11, supporting Trump still, to questioning any part of the benevolent government’s narratives about race, sex, COVID-9/11, election fraud, false flag operations, Russians, the filibuster etc.
It doesn’t matter what it is. If Davos is against it and it will hurt the Democrats’ chances this November then you are a dangerous domestic terrorist. Full stop.
And woe to anyone who strays from the political orthodoxy. They will be denied basic protections under the rule of law, because they are sub-humans who don’t respect civil society enough to enjoy its benefits.
It’s as clumsy and dangerous as it is insane. But it is also, sadly, reality.
So, into this mess New Statesman, probably paid for by the Hildebeast herself, runs a hit piece on Gabbard to trigger the disgust circuit in every squishy mid-wit in the burbclaves of the rapidly draining cities of Blue States.
The main reason they are doing this is to bring charges against Donald Trump so he can’t run again in 2024.
But, I also think it’s deeper than that.
Crying Wolf Creates Natural Narrative Immunity
Davos is losing the war of the narratives. Support for 1/6 as some kind of ‘insurrection’ is failing as more people realize this is just another ridiculous bit of divisive politics, the kind which Gabbard has been outspoken about since leaving Congress.
As they clumsily pivot off COVID-9/11 Davos is in dire need of a new existential threat to society.
By the fall all they’ll have left in the U.S. is their control over legacy media, which is hemorrhaging audience faster than Germany is burning through its natural gas supplies, and their operatives in the various alphabet agencies.
They will lose substantial support in Congress as the country now has ‘crisis fatigue’ to the point where even another virus outbreak would get half the effect it got with COVID, regardless of its lethality.
That’s because they have cried wolf too many times now. What was a strategy for destroying our confidence in our political system has now morphed quickly into reflexive distrust of everything all politicians say, to the point where it’s impossible to use public health’ as a means to political control.
It’s early days of this emerging shift in the zeitgeist, but it’s palpable. I assure you it’s real.
If my instincts on this are correct then what we’re seeing now with the 180 degree shift away from “OMG Omicron! is teh killarz of all the lil’ childrens!” by Bill Gates and company is a form of political desperation as the mood of the country turns ugly against those that stole more than two years of our lives.
And there is nothing more indicative of this fear than them running an extended trial balloon on resurrecting the Hildabeast as their savior going forward.
And that brings me back to Gabbard. Remember it was Hillary stealing the nomination in 2016 that pushed Gabbard off the Davos career track. It’s why she resigned from the DNC and set her squarely at odds with Hillary.
Once you cross Hillary there is no going back. And if Davos is looking to Hillary to try and salvage what’s left of Biden’s first term then they also have to be positioned against her.
So this article in the New Statesman tells me two things.
1) Hillary is definitely in the mix as the Democrats’ Hail Mary because Hillary would have commissioned this piece to keep the Progressives from jumping ship.
2) Davos is terrified of what comes in 2022, because they may not be able to split the Republican vote come 2024.
I just can’t see Gabbard now as the Trojan House to fulfill #2. Her past involvement with these folks is what holds lot of people back from supporting her, and I’m more than okay with them remaining skeptical. Trust, but verify and all that.
But, if anything, looking at the political landscape and her consistently attacking the Democrats on core issues where they have betrayed the country and put it in those terms, she’s more likely to split the Democrats even further. Sanders is done. He played ball, got the paycheck and is now dead to Progressives. These people are turning on AOC now.
And the purity spiral will only get worse. Ace Clinton strategies Paul Begala is now, right on cue, blaming Democrat voters, because it’s hard to do any self-reflection when you don’t cast one in a mirror.
Gabbard wants none of that crowd and she’s laying a foundation for a campaign outside of either party that reaches across all the right issues to build a real following.
That’s the dominant theme in this New Statesman article, fear that there is no hope for their 2024 strategies to be successful. They are all but admitting now they have no chance in 2022 and are hoping with the Fed going on a strong tightening cycle that they can blame the recession and/or financial crisis which emerges on Congressional Republicans.
If the GOP was smart, as big an ‘if’ if there ever was one, they would begin the process of saying this recession is regrettable but necessary. Embrace it and build on the anger at Brandon for screwing everyone in the wake of COVID.
They can see Gabbard coming in to pull centrist votes from Hillary (or whomever) back towards the GOP or worse, advocating for real fiscal and foreign policy reform in D.C. as she runs as a kind of John Anderson figure against Jimmy Carter.
In fact, the more I think about this the more likely John Anderson is the best analogue for her role in 2024. She’s the sane Democrat who’s interested in practical solutions, pulling in a very important 5-7% of swing voters tired of the outright lying, the destruction of communities and leadership turning a blind eye to violence and the coming rape of those same suburbs by Larry Fink and Blackrock.
If you go one step further and revisit the actions of FOMC Chair Jerome Powell, the set up is there for him to morph into the second coming of Paul Volcker. The GOP candidate, possibly Ron DeSantis, then becomes the analogue of Ronald Reagan.
Gabbard running as an independent siphoning off the centrist Democrats who just can’t pull the lever for a Republican would be enough to ensure there’s no chance of a DNC steal in 2024.
Anderson got 5% of the vote in 1980. He ensured that Reagan won states he wouldn’t have otherwise. With the Libertarian Party fully neutered and stuck in logic traps of their own devising, there’s room for a real, honest populist to build a bipartisan ticket with Gabbard and a libertarian type strong on non-interventionist foreign policy and fiscal reform (read; Social Security and Medicare) that would get a lot of votes.
It’s what Bernie Sanders promised but never intended to deliver on.
If Davos keeps pushing for a potential hot war with Russia and/or China, which is still a real possibility, and Biden succumbs to this, or worse, they install Hillary mid-term to pull it off, then a populist of Gabbard’s anti-war but strong patriotic bona fides is a real threat to the future of the DNC long term.
I find the timing of this article very very interesting as much for that as to what it actually says. Because what it says is “Fear Tulsi Gabbard.”
Join My Patreon if you fear the reapers at the DNC
your’re smart, with some very astute insights, but you have blinders, just like others you criticize, and yours so big and thick, that you greatly diminish your insights.
God She’s beautiful. She should be secretary of state when DeSantis is elected President.
Dude!! That is called youth.
Compared to the parade of corpses currently in washington DC, everyone under 60 is considered young.
There is something to be said for respecting one’s elders. There is also something to be said for knowing when its time to step aside and let the next generation lead… the corpses in DC have stayed far far far far too long.
And, Anonymous, in addition to her beauty, she has an extraordinary voice which radiates sincerity, contemplation, peace and strength. Best voice in a politician in decades IMHO.
I agree that they are going to try to go with Hillary. But she cannot be elected even with the Dominion machines cranked up to 11. I see the following scenario as the most probable.
1) Biden resigns shortly “for health reason,” putting the Kamal in the presidency and opening up the VP slot. But we all know that the Ho is dumb as a bag of rocks and twisted as a snake with cramps.
2) The Kamal is instructed to put the Hildabeast in as VP as Ford did with Nelson Rockefeller.
3) Then the Kamal is faced with impeachment for a previous heinous, hidden crime. There is a problem here as the Beast’s ascension to the VP slot requires a majority vote of both houses. If the Democrats are slaughtered in the mid-term, she may not get it. The Beast should have gotten life in the slammer for tax evasion alone with her “foundation.”
4) But if she can get approval from both houses, voilà, the Beast is in the Oval Orifice.
If this goes according to plan, there will be no selection in 2024 due to a “national emergency.” You can see that the Bolshevik media has already started to prep Brandon for toppling.
Now I understand why tin foil is in short supply at the grocery stores…
Speaking of tin foil, I wonder if Blinkin is wearing a tin foil hat while in Ukraine to prevent Havana Syndrome..
That’s funny I believe the polar opposite will happen, and that Tulsi is the chosen one in (not so) deep cover. She’ll win 2024 in a landslide, as a democrat. Trump may or may not be allowed to run, it really doesn’t matter.
Regarding the OP, Tulsi is not a moderate. She is a true progressive. Her political mentor is Dennis Kucinich. True progressives are anti-imperialists, including anti- financial imperialism. She will End the Fed. She will break up the private monopolies.
She’s a National Socialist, in other words and NS is the medium-term future.
I was shocked when I saw her listed on the YGLs of WEF. That sucked. Love her antiwar and unity message. UBI? Fuck no! She SEEMS to have a conscience but looks can be deceiving. She hates HRC so thats good. Will DeSantis get played by the globalists just like Reagan did? Is Socrates real? Madness until 2032? Sovereign individuals after that? We are in weird times. Alan Watt, who I though was a nut case, was right all along.
Trump Gabbard 2024 would be an undefeatable pair. No idea how possible that it though
Why would Trump pick Tulsi Gabbard as a running mate after she endlessly attacked him for her 2020 campaign. Get real.
Right, and Tulsi would never be on a ticket with Trump either. Obviously.
If Killery is going to the oval office she must act quickly while the Commiecrats have Congressional votes. Once securing VP, Kamala will be gone in a Machaivelian moment. Not Even a good food taster will save her from Killery. The “national security” incident will be our Second Civil War and I’m afraid it will be far worse than the first, no quarter will be given, and the Chinese will be landing troops to aid the Killery forces.
Tom–great writeup, and thanks for pointing to an article I never would have seen. I clicked through to it, and I don’t know whether the proper reaction is laughter or total disgust.
It is fascinating in a totally creepy way to see how many ways the article uses to smear Gabbard. I particularly enjoyed the slime trail the writer tried to draw by saying that one of her supporters is Niko House (“who dabbles in far right conspiracy theories’), who maintains a friendship with Jack Posobiec, who () “the Southern Poverty Law Center says has ties to the white-nationalist movement.” So I guess the “stain” of that tie moves back from Posobiec through Niko House (who is black, BTW!) to Tulsi.
That’s just part of the silliness of the article. I encourage anyone who is interested to click through and read it for a few fact-free laughs…..
Tom, great post! I watched a video of yours today with Crypto Rich and Alexander Mercouris from a few days ago which brought me here because I was really impressed with your depth of knowledge and passion. Higgins has been an attack dog against Tulsi for years, I remember the first hit piece against her that I read was written by Higgins before she was running for president. He is very sloppy and gets facts wrong all the time and in general is just a terrible propagandist. But he is eager to smear anyone for a buck so he is hired for that eagerness and shamelessness. I remember a few months back when Tulsi was smeared for being an Islamophobe by him because she spoke against Islamist tyranny on the anniversary of 9-11. He used that to claim that her tweet was some type of evil thing because he was trying to suck up to the type of wealthy Muslims who get upset with any criticism of anything to do with Islam, even if it is just criticizing jihadist tyranny, as anti-Islam evil ISLAMOPHOBIA!! Did you see this commenting on that episode? https://pamho.medium.com/tulsi-gabbard-has-not-changed-you-have-ce2c59389483
If you want to see how an actual principled politician (if such a person even exists) is treated by the entire news media, and also by the entire political class (including the “outsider” Trump), look how Thomas Massie was treated during the CARES rushed legislation process and vote in March 2020. The most blantntly obscene piece of crony giveaways and government control in modern history, let alone the included monetary incentive to murder sick people with a ventilator in the hospital, and only one person loudly and publicly opposed it..Massie. Even the son of “Dr. No”, Rand Paul was conviently sidelined with the invisible enemy cough and couldn’t register a vote, which according to his record against such things would have been a firm NO.
They just shot up 250 million Americans with mRNA clot shots, the dollar is losing value by the day, and every single institution is collapsing. Why assume there will be an election in 2024?
I’m not but you still have to gameplan it out anyway
John Whitehead wrote a good piece today, in which he examined catalogued the Davosian’s progress (in America) towards their goal of global governance tools…
“….fully succeeded in recalibrating our general distaste for anything that smacks too overtly of tyranny.
…like the proverbial boiling frogs…….gradually acclimating us to the spectre of a police state for years now: Militarized police. Riot squads. Camouflage gear. Black uniforms. Armored vehicles. Mass arrests. Pepper spray. Tear gas. Batons. Strip searches. Surveillance cameras. Kevlar vests. Drones. Lethal weapons. Less-than-lethal weapons unleashed with deadly force. Rubber bullets. Water cannons. Stun grenades. Arrests of journalists. Crowd control tactics. Intimidation tactics. Brutality.
This is how you prepare a populace to accept a police state willingly, even gratefully.”
They have made similar progress in Australia, Austria, Italy, Spain, New Zealand, Canada.
Other countries lag behind. They will need a corrective. A new variant?
Tom, I’ve been following Tulsi for years and she would be a definite improvement over anyone else on the horizon. But I’m disappointed by her sly attacks on Muslims, as a way of keeping up her support from the largely Hindutva Indian-American community. There was an attack by some Islamist fanatics on a temple in Bangladesh. No one was killed. The Bangladesh government immediately took stern action. Yet Tulsi went to town with the Islamophobia for stateside consumption. On the other hsnd, she’s said no end of good things about Modi. You would expect from her after all the Muslim-lynchings that she say something about the conference of Modi-associated ‘holy’ men who called openly for genociding 200 million Indian Muslims. But silence. Compare that with the endless tweets about the minor outrage in Bangladesh.
She’s Hindi. Take that for what it’s worth. No one is perfect
I would not put much faith in the hindu gabbard who looks like she got shot with birdshot in the face. she is all for white replacement turning the country into bangladesh with her snake charmer hindus
She’s not Hindi. She’s a Hawaii surfer girl from Maui. She was born and raised Catholic for her first 13 years, and then converted to Hindu as a teen. Her 2020 campaign promoted her as a pure Catholic from birth, while to the Hare Krishnas she was promoted as a pure Hare Krishna from birth, in order to attract campaign financing from Catholics and Hindus alike. The two religions never thought to compare notes. I helped them.
Syed Zaidi’s comments are the repeated false narrative made against Tulsi from the Muslim community. It’s important to understand the various components of this narrative, to separate out truth from fiction, instead of the simplistic answer that she’s “not perfect”. Tulsi comes out pro-Israel. This is the meaning of her “hawk against terrorism” slogan. Tulsi is pro-Modi, because her largest source of campaign financing has come from the Indian-Hindu community. She’s a converted Hindu, not naturally born either Hindu or Indian. She’s a white woman, with white parents, and 25% Samoan heritage. She’s not a Hindu or Indian herself, and only positioning herself this way to attract campaign financing or fund raising from people who only assume “Tulsi” means she’s from India. Progressive-Democrats tend to be pro-Palestine, and pro-Islam. Tulsi’s position is opposite, which makes her unpopular with her party and liberal media. These positions don’t translate to popularity or interest among conservatives, especially Trump’s base, however, who are mostly Christian. Tulsi’s response to this charge, is she’s a practicing Catholic from birth when promoted to Christians, and a practicing Hindu from birth, when promoted to Hindus.
Syed Zaidi claimed:
[There was an attack by SOME Islamist fanatics on a temple in Bangladesh. No one was KILLED].
Instead, news headline, anyone can search:
“Iskcon temple attacked in Bangladesh by 400-500 Islamic mob, 3 Hindus dead.”
So, why lie about it, in an attempt to smear Tulsi Gabbard?
I commented just a while ago, but then I read the Higgins piece. Tulsi is more appalling than I thought. She knows as well as you do who did 9/11. I assume your site is truthy enough for me to get away with saying it was not Muslims. It was Jews. Yet here we have her commitment to unending trouble in the Muslim world. Higgins tells us: “In September, she told Tucker Carlson, that ‘Islamist ideology, which is the political ideology that inspired the terrorist attacks on our country on 9/11, is the greatest threat that we’re facing right now in this country, in the world…’.”
Who knows? Maybe you think this is a minor lie. Do tell.
“Interesting” comment … lots of assumptions taken as fact, lots of emotional language also asserted knowingly as fact-ish (or facty, truthy:-) Lots of topical emotive memes (9/11, Tucker Carlson, Islam all bad/Jews all bad).
It ticked many highly emotional meme-like boxes and if taken seriously/earnestly (i.e. at face value)
Reading the comment (earnestly) is like getting punched in the face/gut – left right left right left right LEFT RIGHT.
To my mind, the comment reveals a mind/heart reacting from the gut in an emotional manner (but trying to keep some assumed “facts” present).
It also reveals (to me) a mind/heart responding to some strong emotive hatred of an “other” and then retreating to the you/me, us/them, good/evil, Jews vs Muslims (in this case) paradigm.
Intentional or not – it is not far off from that point to dislike … anger … disgust …hatred for “the other” … waaaay down the road – which I’d like to avoid!!! … is the Hobbesian “war of all against all.”
Not sure why I got all of that from your comment … maybe I’m sensitive to the “othering” as I try to avoid doing so in my own heart and mind?!?
Ending your comment with a seemingly sincere question (but in reality the question and ask “Do tell” … is just a revelation of what you believe … i.e. not a sincere question – more of challenge to a fight) … and then a classic passive aggressive sign-off (see I’m nice, Aloha … but aggressively! nice as long as you agree with me with – like a big smile along with a middle finger … I might have believed the sign off it were more aloha-ish :-)
Groupthink will be the death of us all … and I’m “confident” asserting as a fact-of-life the following –
All Muslims are neither good nor bad/evil (same for Islamic teachings, thought, and Islamist ideology – there some nuance).
All Jews are neither good nor bad/evil (same for Jewish teachings, thought and ideology).
I like Tom’s article just as much as I hate the New Statesman’s article. That article expresses the contemptible self-righteousness that now pervades the Washington left.
Tulsi Gabbard is a left-winger, but she is also a free thinker, which is why she doesn’t fit neatly in any box. She is certainly on the outs with the Washington left, as are other free thinking left-wingers, such as Naomi Wolf and Jimmy Dore. I don’t see her running as a Republican, even though her populist outlook is somewhat compatible with Republican populists.
The paramount issues of the day are 1) the “pandemic” and the government’s response to it, leading all the way to the technocratic society envisioned by the oligarchs, and 2) the social agenda of the identity extremists, which has been embraced by the Washington left, and which would help tear down the society that technocratic regime intends to replace.
These issues don’t fit neatly on the left>right political spectrum. That is why we see a lot of leftists opposing the Washington establishment and their push for things like a digital I.D. and a world where a man can become a woman merely buy claiming to be one.
Perhaps common sense and sanity is the “ideology” that is needed now. And Tulsi Gabbard can run on such a platform. Maybe she’ll go third party. Maybe she will simply be a spokeswoman for common sense and sanity.
I don’t understand Democratic/DNC politics… actually I do but I don’t understand the theater and posturing around it. No one is getting the Democratic nomination without the approval of the oligarchs who run the Party, Gabbard included:
Is the Democratic primary ‘rigged’ against Bernie Sanders?
Eric Weinstein (the brother of Brett Weinstein) does a deep dive into that video here:
THE COMING U.S. ELECTION
Now, why am I saying all of this? Well, it goes back to a video I’ve not been able to get out of my mind for four years. As some of you may remember from the 2016 election, Jake Tapper was asking democratic national committee chairperson Debbie Wasserman Schultz, about why Bernie Sanders would be leaving New Hampshire with an equal number of convention delegates after trouncing his old rival Hillary Clinton in an historic upset.
Tapper asked, “What do you tell voters who are new to the process who say that this makes them feel like it’s all rigged?”
Schultz: “Unpledged delegates exist really to make sure that the party leaders and elected officials don’t have to be in a position where they are running against grassroots activists (THE VOTERS). We as the Democratic Party, really highlight and emphasize inclusiveness and diversity at our convention, and so we want to give every opportunity to grassroots activists and diverse committed Democrats to be able to participate, attend, and be a delegate at the convention, and so we separate out those unpledged delegates to make sure that there isn’t competition between them.”
Did I hear that right? This is about diversity and inclusion for Super Delegates?
That video and the Chuck Schumer video, about the Intelligence Community having “six ways to Sunday to get back at you” , are the two most important/truthful videos on the internet. IMHO They show how the US system really operates.
Given that, what threat is Tulsi Gabbard to Hillary Clinton? The only thing I can think of is that they fear Gabbard switching to the Republican Party, where she could win the primary or if she runs as an independent?
Why would they do this when they have the nomination system locked down? I can’t make sense of it. The only thing this will do is make her more likely to join the Republicans or run as an independent. IMHO
“…the Fed going on a strong tightening cycle that they can blame the recession and/or financial crisis which emerges on Congressional Republicans.”
That won’t help Democrats before the 2022 election as they are already seen as having all three houses – HofR, Sen and WH. The stock market will probably crash before the rest of the economy.
After 2022, Biden, Kamala, or some other Dem will still occupy the WH and be blamed for the recession.
But whom do the Republicans have besides Trump (and maybe DeSantis)? And what if a recession includes food and healthcare shortages, causing death and misery not just here but all over the world. While the US has an underlying capitalism-supporting Constitution, no other country does and the US will be affected by what politicians in other countries screw up.
Your job as an independent political/economic analyst and journalist is safe, Tom.
please my dear write me back to email so that i will tell you why i contacted you (Haroldmartha35@gmai.)lcom)
While I like what Tulsi says. She can’t be trusted. She is one of Klaus Schwaub’s Young Global Leaders and I trust nothing out of Davis or the WEF. https://www.weforum.org/people/tulsi-gabbard
The person you (Tom) are looking for is Robert Kennedy Jr. He was a real Democrat. He really had multiple epiphanies about where the Democratic party was headed. He really got deep in the fight putting his family name, wealth and reputation (whatever that may be) on the line. He passed his Fidelity test with flying colors. Tulsi Gabbard got elected a state rep from a state that’s barely a state. The home state of Obama where, as we can glean from Obama’s own life story, 40 years ago the CIA had a robust presence. Perhaps her most significant achievement was the WEF award. Which put her on a list with the following names:. Crenshaw, Newsome, Macron, Ardern, Rockefeller and Rothschild. NEVER! I will literally NEVER trust any version of Tulsi Gabbard. I don’t care if she dresses up in a Rosie the Riveter costume. These people are deceivers by design. Remember Tsipris an Greece or Trudeau in France? “Fresh faced up and comers with forward thinking ideas blah blah blah”. I am beyond shocked and disappointed that Tom has been duped so easily. Tulsi Gabbard has very little to put on the line or lose. This is why it’s been easy for her to change her stripes. Her minor publicity stunts are easier explained by her wanting to stay relevant than they are by her having some wholesale ideological reawakening. Even if she really did I would only question her critical thinking skills and if she actually has any true foundations. Besides the WEF. And I don’t know how close you’re watching but I’ve never seen anyone who talks so much bigger than they’re capable of thinking. Big word balloons that immediately deflate from lack of air pressure. It’s exhausting to watch her conjure a big emotive posture only to deliver another vapid and disappointing and unoriginal ‘idea’. RFK Jr on the other had is in their history, their papers, their agendas,their covered up crimes and their legal briefs. On a ticket with Rand Paul or DeSantis, you wouldn’t even need to have an election. If Tulsi Gabbard is in the election at all, you better count the votes very very closely. I don’t and won’t buy her now or ever. We have too many good proven commodities to even be talking about a dud like her. And beyond the unwatched and unread MSM, nobody actually is talking about her. So let’s end the conversation here. Before i start getting suspicious of you too. Apology accepted.
RFK Jr. will never get elected with his vocal palsy. Sorry, but politics in the USA is a second-rate beauty pageant, and you don’t want to see the talent competition, certainly not the swimsuit competition.
Once more, it’s good analysis of the Great Game.
Which many are still playing, unaware that like so many Washington Generals, they are fighting the last war.
Except the Davosians aren’t fighting that war, or playing that game, so any analysis of their actions that presumes they are will of course be a little off.
To paraphrase Sun Tzu, the right premise with faulty analyses will provide the slowest route to understanding, but even excellent analysis is just the noise before defeat, if the premises are too faulty.
I guess we’ll soon see – as Zerohedge said today “The weekend looks a bit false flaggy”
Biden was supposedly going to be a moderate… turns out in brief moments of lucidity, in between the dementia spams, he is batshit left-wing crazy. And so are the infestation of bureaucrats he has appointed to actually run things when he misplaces his sippy cup.
NYC mayor Eric Adams was a Louis Farakhan crazy person “in his youth”, but he assured voters that he had matured over the years and during his time as a police officer…. HAHA!!! He could hardly keep a straight face all the way through his inauguration ceremony. He is still left wing crazy. His female black police commissioner was sworn in before a mural celebrating cop killers. He appointed his crony brother to a lucrative job the brother isn’t qualified for. He appointed a black man as deputy police commisioner. The Soros sponsered DA is black and letting criminals escape with zero bail… so Eric Adams announced he is scared about white supremacy taking hold in NYC.
Chicago Mayor Lightfoot was going to be tough on crime but also support social justice… well she ended up supporting social justice and telling Chicago cops to eat sh!t and die.
And the list of alleged “moderates” goes on and on and on.
Now we are told this Tulsi Gabbard is supposedly a moderate?
Fool us once. Fool us twice. Fool us three times. Its insulting that Tom or anyone else thinks we are supposed to go for this “moderate” nonsense.
Too many lies for way too long. Only a moron would buy into this scam yet again.
Gabbard was always a moderate. She was never a radical. And she’s not in power or is any of the establishment on her side. If she’s running a deep cover game it’s one of the best ones ever run
By that analysis and the fact that these people are really bad at that type of deception, Occams Razor tells us she’s a legitimate cult survivor not a deep cover agent
Their cover stories are usually pond shallow not deep lakes.
Should I read her lips?
Did she get a BJ from her intern?
Slam dunk her WMDs?
If I like my current health insurance, I can pay 5x as much for a plan that covers less but gives free sh!t to welfare class?
Will she drain the swamp? Ignore criminal behavior at the FBI and then lock down the world based on the ramblings of a failed witch doctor? (whom we later learned was the ass-hat that funded the virus in the first place)
Gabbard endorsed Biden to stay in with the criminal cabal. That sums up her so-called “integrity”
And no one with a brain is still promoting UBI. Anyone with an actual brain learned the cost of “free lunch” in grade school. Gabbard is a moron or she wouldn’t be peddling that scam.
Why do you claim she’s a cult survivor? She’s still a member of Science of Identity, and still raising money for the cult. She hired all cult members for all the key roles for her 2020 campaign. She raised $15 million for her 2020 campaign and spent $14 million hiring family and fellow cult members. Her family is also a member of the cult. Her previous husband was a cult member and her present one too. There’s nothing illegal about it, but why claim she’s a survivor, when she’s been in it her entire life and is still a practicing, contributing member?
We don’t know if she’s a deep cover agent yet, but part of the blame for this falls on conservative media, who fails to vet or investigate and solely waves a flag for Tulsi, turning a blind eye to any potential problems. If you filter out the pointless and fake media attacks, designed as a distraction, similar to Trump, which she has to endure, and solely focus on her actions, it will be easier to spot potential falsity.
Hey Tom – Can you expand on the libertarian logic trap?
Some of the criticism of Tulsi is over the top, but I must acknowledge she has some ideas that are terrible. UBI should be a no go forever. Her stance on gun control would be awful as well. If Desantis and RFK Jr win, which would be my dream ticket, Tulsi would make a fantastic secretary of state.
As for the WEF stuff, and the council on foreign relations, yeah that is bad judgement on her part, but she has backed away from that. Davos trolls don’t act like she does. If she folds it would most likely be when she won any office, and then the deep state threats would come. I think she figured that out and wisely retreated after the Democratic candidates were strong armed into supporting Biden. I think her doing Fox news spots on occasion doesn’t make her a plant or anything like that. Just a tool for Fox to embarrass the Dems and thats not so bad.
She didn’t volunteer her CFR membership and never told us she was recognized by WEF in Davos, with WEF still maintaining a complimentary glowing Tulsi Gabbard page on the World Economic Forum website even today. These clues were leaked and spread across social media, and I personally had a hand in it as a feather in my cap. However, it’s the denial of her supporters that’s most troubling. Lee Stranahan, former Fault Lines narrator on Radio Sputnik argued in 2019, that not all members of the deep state swamp CFR are bad, because Tulsi Gabbard was a member, so some must be good. Likewise, it sounds like Tom Luongo is saying that Tulsi being selected as a 2015 Young World Leader in the company of sons of Rothschild and Soros isn’t a big deal, especially if Tulsi Gabbard is a member, it means that some members of Davos are for the good. A similar argument was made by the Hare Krishnas to convince their congregation to wholeheartedly support Tulsi, arguing that since Tulsi is a vegan, facilitating baby butchery er abortion law making that it’s somehow superior to being a non-vegan live organ harvester.
So you only ever show up here or on my Twitter feed when I talk about Tulsi Gabbard. There’s something going on here that isn’t rational.
I was naive and gave this woman money because I believed her. But when she endorsed Biden I was like WTF? Instead of saying “Both candidates suck, I don’t endorse either” She backs Biden. Screw her!! And wake up people! We aren’t going to take back this country with cult of personalities who are actually sell outs.
She is yet another extremist left wing nut job claiming to be a “moderate”, at least until she gets into office.
Not falling for this crap again.
But she is pretty, and Tom is smitten
Tulsi smashed Kamala and tossed her out of the race.
Then Tulsi dropped out and endorsed Biden in her place.
Biden picked Kamala for the coveted VP spot.
Tulsi got nada – presidential chances shot.
You’re a nut. Good luck with your bunker. Nut.
I was a big Tulsi Fan until it came down to stop the Wars in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. She doesn’t understand the fact that in order to end a War, the Soldiers and Sailors have to refuse to fight. The examples are The Christmas Truce of 1914 and the Sit-Down Strikes, Fragging, and the Sabotage of 5 AC Carriers in ’70-’72 in Vietnam. That’s when I dumped her. Even Jimmy Dore saw it and he told it to her face on his show. She talks a good game but can’t back it up.
Peace candidate Tulsi
endorsed war President Biden
so, she could have more time for her surfing
with her good friend Poseidon?
Tulsi attacks President Trump, demands removal all US troops from Syria, end Middle East forever war.
Oct 9: Trump announces US troop withdrawals from Syria.
Oct 19: Tulsi attacks Trump – orders him to keep U.S. troops in Syria.
Trump announces troops will stay in Syria.
Dec 2: Tulsi attacks President Trump, demands removal all US troops from Syria, end Middle East forever war.
Without ongoing war and conflict, for Tulsi to attack, what was Tulsi Gabbard’s big appeal heading into 2020 election?
Presidents are for four years or eight years. Bureaucrats are in DC for *LIFE* and they know it.
Bureaucrats sabotaged Trumps Presidency. Even if one hates Trump, you should be mature enough to realize VOTERS should decide if/when Trump is done, not corrupt bureaucrats.
Despite media insistence, most voters now see that Biden can barely string together a full sentence. He has dementia. He is not running the country. Federal bureaucrats are running things now, and at best Biden stamps approval on something he didn’t even read.
Does this sell out politician Gabbard have the stones to fire a million bureaucrats on day one? REALLY fire AT LEAST a million bureaucrats? If not, she would get sabotaged and end-run all four years. She would be a pretty face on the TV, but bureaucrats would be actually running things. Why not employ one of those Victoria Secret underwear models if we just want a pretty face?
There is the matter of $29 billion in debt and climbing fast. No president will be successful in the future unless the cost structure of the federal government is addressed. A government deep in debt, running $2 trillion deficit spending (before “emergency” spending that happens every year) — does not have the resources to do much of anything at all.
Any successful President in the future, either party, must take back control from a corrupt bureaucracy. Any President that hopes to make any meaningful changes will need money and resources to do whatever, and that means getting costs under control. It means getting spending under control.
Corporations had to “right size” decades ago to survive, and like it or not Uncle Sam must do the same. It won’t be fun. It is the difference between Uncle Sam becoming Bethlehem Steel or GE.
A sell out like Gabbard that endorses Biden to keep her spot in “the party” isn’t going to rock the boat, never mind reduce the federal head count.
They are not afraid of Tulsi Gabbard. She is one of them. She is part of the globalist cabal. She is a member of Klaus Schwab’s Young Global Leaders. Look it up.
Did you not read the article? How many people are going to make this comment when I addressed is in literally the 2nd graf?
Reading is fun for mentals
NYC mayor Eric Adams was a Louis Farakhan nut-job “in his youth”, but claimed during the campaign that he had matured.
SURPRISE!!! He is a still a nut job. Still believes the Farakhan spew.
So now we get to hear how Gabbard was once a WEF criminal, but oh she has learned the err of her ways…. unless she gets elected and then she will have a sudden WEF relapse.
Seriously Tom. Stop. We saw what you wrote in paragraph two, we just aren’t buying the crap anymore.
Once a WEF thief, always a WEF thief. These people don’t get reformed, they get elected.
Honest people don’t choose to keep company with criminals, and Washington DC is a city full of criminals.
Thanks for allowing what you may feel are many annoying comments. I was expecting censorship but I’m grateful you allowed them to go through, because my comments are well thought out, and not just off the top of my head. I research my comments, so it’s not simply personal opinion, or targeted meanness towards Tulsi. I only comment on subjects I believe I know something about and have studied and done research to verify. Why is that considered only showing up on Twitter and in your own site, when you talk about Tulsi Gabbard? Maybe I only know something about this particular subject, but I don’t know anything about crypto currencies, gold, guns or goats. When those types of subjects are on your Twitter feed, I can only read, not comment.
Secret of Tulsi Gabbard is to tune out the false attacks dished out to her by MSM, and solely focus on her own words and actions. Gabbard has a history of flip-flopping on positions, promoting issues conservatives oppose, promising one side support for an issue then promising or worse voting the opposite on the issue with along Democrat Party lines, and being out of coordination or in contradiction to her own campaign’s message. Many who’ve spent years tracking Tulsi Gabbard, as amateur opposition research, have always observed Tulsi has always been in it for Tulsi, sometimes abandoning her own base, if it improves her advancement or enrichment. She sometimes repeats narratives and has difficulty thinking outside the box when questioned. All these faults are easily observed if one comes from the point of view of neutral, unbiased reporting, evenly vetting her statements compared to her actions, which is sorely missing in conservative alternate-media, which almost exclusively promotes her. Haven’t you ever wondered if the true purpose Tulsi’s 2020 campaign was fund raiser for her Hawaii religious cult – Science of Identity? She stayed in far longer than her abysmal numbers warranted, raising $15 million, and spending $14 on family members and cult associates she almost exclusively hired for her campaign. Why don’t conservative commentators, who pride themselves on investigative reporting, dispassionately report on Tulsi Gabbard? Is there really such a thing as a good WEF or CFR members? This contradiction can’t be unexplained?
Boy, John, you really have it in for her, lol. You’re gonna be bummed when she’s the next prez. Me, I think it will be a predictable move (and the best one available) by the elite. She was chosen years ago.
I don’t do politics, don’t vote, f- that, but she’s probably the best politician out there I know of besides Putin and Sahra Wagenknecht.
Okay bud, name three things she’s flip-flopped on.
You obviously didn’t read all my comments above, because I DEFENDED Tulsi Gabbard against Syed Zaidi false statement. I found it fascinating the Tom accepted his lie and didn’t check to see whether it was true or not? He simply replied as he always does that, she’s not perfect.
Syed Zaidi stated:
[There was an attack by SOME Islamist fanatics on a temple in Bangladesh. No one was KILLED].
Instead, news headline, anyone can search:
“Iskcon temple attacked in Bangladesh by 400-500 Islamic mob, 3 Hindus dead.”
So, why did Syed Zaidi lie about it, in an attempt to implicate and SMEAR Tulsi Gabbard? Why didn’t you or Tom defend her with the facts?
I support truthful investigative journalism and accurate and unbiased reporting. I have investigated Tulsi Gabbard’s false statements and flip-flopping on her positions, and reported on it, while her gushing base repeats false narratives. At the same time, I oppose fake news and false smears made against her and set the record straight in her defense. This is what her cult following in alternative media should be doing, but instead they’ve got a bias that solely spins to defends her. I find that disturbing, so I report on, doing what they should be doing – balanced, unbiased reporting.
Which statement have I made that you disagree with? Do you have contradictory evidence that proves I’m mistaken?
John. You are only interested in “truthful investigative journalism” when it pertains to Tulsi Gabbard. That means there’s ab animus which is unhealthy and everyone should be aware of.
You haven’t or couldn’t be bothered to comment on this blog or my Twitter feed on any other subject which suggests something else is at work sinister or otherwise
I’ll leave it to the readers to figure out
John, lol, okay, so you included a token ‘defense’ of Gabbard amongst your plethora of criticisms and warnings. Thanks for setting the record straight. :)
I noticed didn’t ACTUALLY reply to my question…
This is where the rubber meets the road for you and your self-credentialed unbiased reporting, John: name three things Tulsi has flip-flopped on. Failing that, name two, or one. The you can add another feather to your cap, and doff it, too, if it pleases you.
I’ll be here waiting to counter.
IMHO Tulsi is positioning herself for a run for governor or senate in Hawaii. She has the organization and the ability to raise money, and Should the Obiden Regime drum up a war with Russia she has an opportunity to emerge as the peace candidate and that’s one reason she is feared by the regime.
Thankfully, peace candidate Tulsi, endorsed War President Biden.
Biden left Afghanistan (badly), is leaving Iraq and Syria, and is talking like he wants to let Russia have The Ukraine in exchange for blowing up the Imperial petrodollar by excluding Russia from SWIFT, lol.
Was Tulsi wrong? ;)
Tom Luongo stated:
[John. You are only interested in “truthful investigative journalism” when it pertains to Tulsi Gabbard. That means there’s ab animus which is unhealthy, and everyone should be aware of.
You haven’t or couldn’t be bothered to comment on this blog or my Twitter feed on any other subject which suggests something else is at work sinister or otherwise]
Are you sure your statements are correct? I’ve been following you for years on Twitter. I “liked” and shared many things you’ve said and articles you shared, that weren’t related to Tulsi Gabbard. I’ve shared and promoted your articles to my own feed or shared on FB. I only have expertise in limited areas however, and this is the 2nd time I’m repeating this, so I don’t understand why you’re making this false claim? I don’t comment on things I don’t understand or know anything about. I do know some things about Tulsi Gabbard that conflict with her cult following’s assumptions. I have made comments in the past on your Twitter page, asking you questions about global politics that you’ve liked or have responded to. I defended your position when you hung up on Lee Stranahan of Fault Lines. If you scroll above, you’ll see I also DEFENDED Tulsi Gabbard when Syed Zaidi lied.
Is there any statement I’ve made above that you dispute with contradictory evidence? If I made a mistake or any false charge against Tulsi Gabbard, then correct the record and I’ll change my position. I’m doing oppo research on Tulsi Gabbard, because I find it’s missing and needed in conservative media. What’s sinister about that? What Tulsi’s base demands however is absolute loyalty. If I defend Tulsi, I must solely defend and solely promote Tulsi, and never oppose her, as if under a spell. I’m really surprised that you accuse me of being sinister. That’s a low blow.
By any and all means available, Hillary can still win it all. Now, of course, that requires that a lot of people must “be suicided” and silenced forever, but that’s just peanuts in the Big Game for Power. She will regardless be the most divisive President ever in US history, and quite possibly drive the country over the cliff for good. That’s just who she is, and Hillary Clinton never forgives or forgets anyone standing in her way…
Tulsi Gabbard versus Ron DeSantis however, would be something to behold. But Hillary hates Tulsi Gabbard, so that will not fly either, and Kamala Harris cannot stop giggling, so who’s next? Whoever it is, there will be some serious “witchcraft” coming from the DNC in time for 2024.
The key word going forward is fear! Who do you fear the most, the new airbrushed Hillary (with all that baggage), Bimbo Queen Kamala, or the still too young Tulsi Gabbard who (for now) is tainted with that WEF/Young Global Leader lunacy?
Sidenote: Klaus Schwab’s Young Global Leaders are pretty much the Hitler Youth of Globalism, and trust in our leaders is in short supply after all these Covid-days. Only the fear remains now…
OK, so we all agree that politician Gabbard is lying because we see her lips moving. Case closed.
I predicted (here and elsewhere) that by the time this covid lockdown / mRNA shot fraud was over, there would be criminal charges… and immunity would be rescinded from the liars like Pfizer and Fauci.
So left wing talk show weenine Bill Maher just called the 2 week / 2 year lockdown a catastrophic **MORAL** crime. And he is a left wing, get Trump at all costs guy.
Its too soon for the “I told you so” dance, but its time to warm up. The lockdown was a human rights violation. Forced shots (any medical procedure) are war crimes under the Geneva convention.
The cost of the lockdowns are just starting to get tallied. Missed medical screenings. Missed treatments. Elderly who died alone so Fauci could feel important. School kids that are (at best) two years behind where they should be. Hundreds of thousands of small businesses destroyed.
F Pfizer. F Fauci. And get those gallows ready!!!
Tulsi Gabbard has been decidedly pro-vax. She spent nearly 3 months, from Dec 2020 until late Feb 2021, daily pounding the tables on Facebook and Twitter, begging people to get vaxed especially the elderly. She implored Gov of Hawaii to get elderly in State of Hawaii vaxed. Lately she’s been promoting Pfizer’s COVID pill, and now Monoclonal antibodies made from Mouse/Human chimera DNA. Gives being “slipped a Mickey” a whole new meaning. Tulsi’s pro-vax stance will hurt her appeal with Trump’s base.
When it comes to Tulsi Gabbard, me thinks John Gensler doth protest too much.
That’s completely obvious. It’s been this way for three years. I think he’s a DNC plant.
You’ve repeated a similar narrative and I’ll repeat my similar reply. There’s not going to be any accountability. They’ll burn the house down and watch from the sidelines. Everything that happened before will be small potatoes compared to the unimaginable destruction. It’s hard to believe but unfortunately all too plausible.
Once again I’ll repeat my own analysis that the evidence is nearly incontrovertible that the Obiden Regime has turned the USA into a CCP satrapy. Tulsi’s future within the criminal syndicate masquerading as the Democratic Party will be determined in Beijing. Davos may be a factor that will soon be erased by Vladimir the Great and the new Russian Empire that not only controls the energy supplies to Europe but its breadbasket as well. Hopefully, the emerging leadership of the Republican Party will balance CCP and Russian power by implementing the Churchillian vision of a United English Speaking Empire composed of North America, UK, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, and possibly the low countries, Scandinavia, and just perhaps, Italy and France.
You’re correct John that she pushed the vax early on. As in, at the very beginning. Then there has been radio silence from her on the vax ever since.
You are incorrect regarding the Covid pill. She is absolutely opposed to the Covid pills on grounds of the health risks they obviously pose. She video tweeted about this. This obviously suggests, in combination with her radio silence on the vax, that she is probably now in the ‘Rogan’ camp regarding the vax. And I don’t think she’s above issuing a mea culpa when the time comes.
She IS, like you say, supportive of monoclonal antibodies, as is the ‘resistance’ in general.
Trump is more pro-vax than Tulsi. Hell, Trump credits himself for the vaxxes in the first place lol. Both are opposed to segregation and mandates. Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity adore Tulsi, and those two guys lead a large chunk of Trump’s base, which is is big reason why Tulsi will run as a democrat, destroy Kamala again, and win in a landslide.
How is Tulsi too young? She’s a warrior right in her prime. That makes zero sense, Morosamguten.
I am not defending Trump by investigating Tulsi. Two wrongs don’t make a right. Supporting the better of two evils is a false argument. It’s always assumed that because I’m vetting Tulsi, which should be conservative media’s job, it means I’m for someone else. Instead, I’m for none. I’ve also applauded Tulsi Gabbard, on social media, whenever her actions align with my conservative and religious values. I’m not a blind follower or member of her cult following however which demands constant and absolute obedience and loyalty.
Tulsi was daily pushing the COVID vax on her social media pages from late 2020 through early 2021. Then silence for most of the year until Nov 2021. The explanation for this long period of silence is she was training as a Liaison Officer with the CIA and was imbedded with Army special forces in Somalia for most of 2021. She quietly left the Hawaii National Guard in June 2021 and is now in US Army Reserves. She’s been promoted to Lt. Colonel since then. In Nov, 2021 she released a video calling people to stop taking Merck’s experimental COVID pill with adverse side effects, in favor of experimental Monoclonal antibodies with adverse side effects. She’s most recently been promoting Pfizer’s experimental COVID pill with adverse side effects. No one questions however if she receives any promotion fees from Pfizer?
Why don’t conservative commentators, who pride themselves on investigative reporting, dispassionately vet Tulsi Gabbard discrepancies? Gold Goats ‘n Guns mission statement reads “Speaking Truth, Destroying Narratives”, but in the case of Tulsi Gabbard, refuses to investigate, dismisses legitimate fact-based evidence and censors the truth. Rather than examine the facts, Tom chooses resorting to personal ad hominin attacks, but few question it, out of blind love for Tulsi, which mimics the same psyop created for Trump’s base. Trump, who Alex Jones claims is a “creation of Army intelligence” parallels Tulsi. Mainstream media attacks around the clock which creates a distraction for their respective base, causing them to circle the wagons to defend, and tune out all questioning, whether false or legitimate.
John, grow up. I’ve acknowledged her short comings and still find her interesting if not potentially compelling in American politics.
It’s too bad you can’t see the strategic forest for the trees because you are convinced of something different. We’ve been doing this for 3 years over Gabbard.
This is clearly a vendetta on your part and your use of the phrase “conservative commentators” now calls even further into question your motives beyond your obvious animus towards Gabbard.
So, accept that or move on.
My question is who in conservative media is investigating and vetting Tulsi Gabbard? I’m observing a similar blindness towards Tulsi Gabbard as was applied to Trump’s campaign. Conservative media, for lack of a better term, almost exclusively promoted Trump in 2016, defending against unjust attacks from corporate media, but who uncovered Trump being a long-time Rothschild man? Tulsi’s CFR and Davos membership wasn’t revealed or examined by the same conservative media that got Trump elected. Outsiders and amateur investigators spread the word. I’m simply calling for identifying potentially false populist leaders early, rather than late. Why is that so evil in your mind?
This starts off as fantastical as thinking Trump was still a fully independent outsider caring about America first
Correcting my earlier comment:
Tulsi Gabbard is a US Army LTC and Civil Affairs officer who trained with 351st Civil Affairs Command in Mountain View, California and later with 350th Civil Affairs & Psychological Operations Command in Ft Bragg, NC, before being deployed to the Horn of Africa in 2021. Although a US Army Civil Affairs & Psychological Operations Command Officer may work covertly, embedded with 82nd Airborne troops, there’s no proof of any connection to CIA, which was mere conjecture. There’s a link to Tulsi Gabbard’s group in an article in ‘Honolulu Civil Beat’. According to the article, Tulsi Gabbard originally announced through her Congressional Office in August 2020, that she was leaving the Hawaii National Guard to train as a Civil Affairs officer in order to aid Native Americans in Alaska.
I saw she wasn’t stupid (that’s my main criteria) and reacts to new information. We already know our views are better informed than hers, but in any outcome her presence can only help and there are other positions. It’s really true RFK is an encyclopedia compared and I want someone on his level for my country, regardless of origins. But she helps and she looks smarter than much of the elected officials in Canada except Poilievre (he’s doing the trucker thing, he was pushing the mRNA jabs before :), but he’s a very career politician). Compare her to Tool, Justin, Singh, Joe, and all the other groomed maniacs – as long as they beat their grooming.
Missed this Dr lady https://twitter.com/LeslynLewis/status/1487549582192095233 looks solid
(follow up to unposted comment) Did you see Donald throw his weight behind the convoy? Now I officially fucking hate that man. Go to hell Donald! He knows perfectly well his son’s comments were more than enough without this agitator and he’s doing this for his own career. Can you guys please keep the bastard on a leash?
Anti-intellectual opportunist. His support was clearly self-serving since everyone was already decided on that movement. He’s trying to come out ahead of DeSantis. You can see it from here.
It’s hard enough not getting my beliefs hyper-polarized by hyper-patriotism before he opens his trap.
You know exactly what he did too. In 2016 the Libertarian Party if they’d had a stronger candidate could have reached double-digits, which is the threshold for relevance. Even if the party’s full of shills and weird establishment types, it’s hearts and minds. Donald and Gary ruined it. Sorry guys but fuck this man forever.
Come on guys, please
Ron Paul >>>>>> Donald Duck
You missed your own jesus, get it yet? I’m done, sorry Tom. You guys have the dumbest and absolute smartest people in the world I ever talked to and it gave me permanent rib damage.
He deserves the break
This is sad and funny…evidently the Pfizer CEO only meant the Omicron virus… they are limited for Omicron…
Ok forget ALL these people, sorry for spamming, this is the final boss. This man speaks for me:
You must log in to post a comment.