In this year’s public blog two-part extravaganza I went over my predictions for 2024 (here and here). In them I brought up the idea that ‘soft secession’ would make it’s way into the public conversation in both the US and Canada. It wasn’t really a tough call to make but it was something that needed to be discussed in the public sphere.
We saw the beginnings of this last year with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith declaring she would not be collecting carbon taxes to send to Ottawa to fund Chrystia Freeland’s dreams of destroying the country.
Smith is in the news again with her pledge to further defy Ottawa by announcing Alberta would be looking to double oil and gas production. She did so at an event with Tucker Carlson in Edmonton. I’m not sure how Smith is going to go about this, since I do not explicitly understand the legal limits she can defy Ottawa on this.
But this is a big deal. Smith isn’t the only one here. Saskatchewan’s Scott Moe is following her lead on carbon taxes. This is a classic example of why we don’t need a majority of attack dogs to take on Davos and the rest of the globalists.
Not everyone is a leader, like Smith clearly is. Some are simply followers. They only make their move when someone else sticks their neck out first to find out whether it’ll get chopped off.
Many, including myself, admire Russian President Vladimir Putin for this exact reason. Donald Trump, in many ways, owes his popularity to this effect as well. It doesn’t matter if they make mistakes, are imperfect, or even fail to achieve ‘flawless victory.’ What matters is that they go first and lead on behalf of the people they are supposed to represent.
Back in 2019 Tucker Carlson made this exact point in one of his most important opening monologues:
By doing so they inspire others to take their first steps and what starts as a disgruntled handful of people bitching about the government around a campfire turns into a mass movement against tyranny.
This is exactly how the American Revolution started, in the pubs and meeting halls. It was the businessmen turned into smugglers and the farmers turned into sharecroppers that eventually put a critical mass of them into the same room hatching a plan to overthrow an absentee landlord of a king.
We’re seeing this all across the West. And if I have to give credit where credit is more than due then that credit goes to the ‘Gilet Jaunes’ or Yellow Vests of France. Remember them?
While they left the headlines quickly, because of the embarrassment, they never really went away. France has been in a state of rolling protests against the Macron government since then.
Gone to Texas?
We can easily draw a through-line from the Yellow Vests to the Canadian Truckers to the Dutch Farmers to Danielle Smith to the situation on the Texas border, which is clearly spiraling out of control but in a very good way.
Governor Greg Abbot’s letter to the Biden Administration declaring them in violation of the Constitution for stopping Texas from securing the border is a major escalation. The States have become ‘uncomfortable’ and are beginning to bare their canines.
For too long the States have gone along with Federal overreach because benefits of redistributing the tax money back to them outweighed the costs politically for those with higher aspirations. Governors of big states are always Presidential hopefuls of one stripe or another.
But there comes a point where the situation in DC is so predatory, so openly anathema to the health of the country itself, those aspirations have almost zero future value. That’s where Greg Abbot found himself with the Biden Administration’s open border policy whose obvious purpose was to invite the world to tilt the 2024 election in the Democrats’ favor… and by Democrats’ I mean Davos, whose agenda Biden et.al. are clearly advancing.
When the Supreme Court passed the buck, at least for the time being, on Texas’ right to secure its border, Abbot had to act. There are a number of solid defenses of Abbot from Mark Wauck and Martin Armstrong here but ultimately, the blame lies with “Biden” for not doing anything to secure the border.
Abbot’s Attorney General Ken Paxton backed him up and, as of today, 25 other States have openly expressed support for Texas’ stand against the lawlessness of “Biden’s” executive order.
You can see where this is headed folks. “Biden” is giving Texas an ultimatum to comply. The Democrats are demanding Biden call up the Texas National Guard. The entire thing has a wholly manufactured feel to it, but it is also something that had to happen. The States had to stand up to this.
And as I’ve talked about at length, the goal here is splitting the US up because a divided US, falling apart politically at this point in history, is exactly what our enemies want. The eventual goal is undermining the validity of the US debt markets and Washington D.C.’s ability to pay its bills.
There is no Great Reset with a fully functional United States.
This is why Abbot’s move is so very important. It’s not about the pols in D.C., it’s about awakening the proles across the country. The people now have to decide what country they want to live in going forward. One where the power of the gun rules or one where laws rule?
This is the type of moment which clarifies and sharpens the focus of those who have, to this point, been ‘comfortable’ enough not to see the threats for what they are. A little ‘secession’ or, in this case, a little ‘federalism’ is a good thing.
Because despite the smooth-brained arguments of the soft-headed midwits, we do not live in a democracy. The question I have now is what’s the over/under on “Biden” declaring Texas in a state of insurrection against the Union in order to deny it, as a State, its vote this fall?
If Texas refuses to ‘turn blue’ then the next move would be to maneuver its governor into full opposition to DC. The question I have here is who is in control of the escalation framework here? Texas or the FedGov?
If it’s Texas then they keep securing the border and proving that when push comes to shove, federalism returns to the public conversation. If it’s the FedGov, then given who we’re dealing with here, expect every ridiculous escalation you can imagine.
We’re talking about people trying to ban Donald Trump from the ballot over a riot on Capitol Hill less embarrassing than what the French do in Paris over a holiday weekend and which most people believe was a false flag event (and they would be correct). Do you really think they wouldn’t deny Texas their vote at an electoral college they don’t even like?
“And as I’ve talked about at length, the goal here is splitting the US up because a divided US, falling apart politically at this point in history, is exactly what our enemies want. The eventual goal is undermining the validity of the US debt markets and Washington D.C.’s ability to pay its bills…There is no Great Reset with a fully functional United States”.
Maybe the United States would be better split up. I see a “fully functional United States” as the very heart and soul of the Great Reset.
I hear what you are saying, but City of London is trying to break the US bond market and that is what this is really about. Period. If you think the banksters rule the world, then you have to think about this in those terms. And the London bankers absolutely still want to control things behind the scenes.
Read this afternoon that 10 states have pledged or already sent national guards to help Texas. Also the Border Patrol union tweeted this: “Rank-and file BP agents are not going to start arresting TX NG members for following their LAWFUL orders. That’s fake news”
Thanks for the update
2 neocon statist conclusions of yours prevent me from liking or sharing your article. Trump is anything other than a tool of the globalists. Mr. Operation Warp Speed does their biding while proclaiming the opposite. The US staying together is the only thing preventing the Great Reset, wow what a moronic conclusion. The reset is not possible without the US Federal Government. Secessions not only of States, but the break up of involuntary unions all over the world is what needs to happen to end the globalists control. Yeah, it’s all about keeping Trump out of office. You are clueless.
Trump was a guy, with many inadequacies, who happened to wander into the wrong place at the wrong time. He is not an intellectual giant, but any person with a bit of common sense can steer the country onto a better course and Trump had the means and naivety to try. Operation Warp Speed was a “rolling” operation. The same way that Kennedy got rolled into the Bay of Pigs, Truman into creating the National Security State, and Eisenhower into denying the U2 incident, etc. One of Trump’s greatest flaws is his ego and that he must rely on the advice of others. Sincerely, God help us all, as he does not have the erudition equal to the current president of Russia.
The United States, with its strong Constitution, is not the ideal vehicle for a technocratic government, whereas the European Union is. The EU, however, lacks a reserve currency and a military industrial complex necessary to protect Western collateral, so the United States has its uses, provided it can be used and controlled. For the Great Reset to occur, democracy must be absent or corrupted by the WEF oligarchy. In its present federalist form, the United States is a hinderance rather than an asset of the Great Reset.
The best explanation I can give you for what is happening is a “power nexus transfer”. These have occurred periodically, on a century time scale. One of the first was:
The Decline of the Dutch Republic
“The Dutch economy, already burdened by the high national debt and concomitant high taxation, suffered from the other European states’ protectionist policies, which its weakened fleet was no longer able to resist. To make matters worse, the main Dutch trading and banking houses moved much of their activity from Amsterdam to London after 1688. Between 1688 and 1720, world trade dominance shifted from the Republic to Great Britain.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glorious_Revolution#The_decline_of_the_Dutch_Republic
The Dutch Republic simply lacked the muscle to protect the assets of the Dutch East India Company and other joint stock companies, so Britain became the next host. Once the British Empire was exhausted and could no longer do the job, the United States became the next host. And the future host is supposed to be the European Union.
However, that depends on the United States not being able to resist, so, with its massive debt, social discord and most of its industries offshored, it is well on its way, looking a lot like the late Dutch Republic … but the decline is not happening fast enough. As was the case with the decline of the Dutch Republic, the “banking and trading houses must move”. If the United States can resist this and chart its own populist course (by not being in the business of protecting the assets of the global elites with trillion-dollar military expenditures), with the abundant natural resources (currently neutered by EU sourced green movements, ie, Climate Change, etc.) it has, Davos/WEF will be left high and dry.
What you are proposing, having the world break up into tiny “autonomous” pieces, is exactly what they want. While we all want limited democratic self-governance, we must also recognize that Democratic systems are the most vulnerable to oligarchic takeovers, now, perfected to-a-tee through modern day “color revolutions” and media control. This is why they want to break up Russia into 5 pieces, “divide and rule”.
All Tom is pointing out is that the upcoming transition is not going like the other two: Dutch -> England, England -> United States. There are forces, both foreign and domestic, that are determined to see this not succeed. Our mission, as the little guys, is to see that we don’t get trampled by the big guys as this all plays out … and, in order to do that, we must be able to see as clearly as possible.
Incoherent. If you had a point here, it was lost amongst poor grammar, ad hominem, and piss-poor “argument” construction.
This is the end game.
Trump promises a 1-Day blood bath, Heads going to roll, if he wins ’24.
1)) Returns the US dollar to a commidty gold based currency by closing down the Federal Reserve and negating all US debt owed to those private bank monopolies.
2)) Ends the Russian/Ukraine War in a day. Here’s the deal: The US pulls out of Nato in exchange that Putin pulls out of the Ukraine.
3)) Restores the Rights of the States to bureaucratically regulate all intra-State trade and commerce by disbanding all the Federal bureaucracies.
President Trump does this on Day 1 after sworn into Office, and manages the feathers flying for the next 4 years.