Iran has successfully navigated the first phase of its resistance to U.S. sanctions pressure. The U.S. State Department has admitted it’s goal of reducing Iran’s oil exports to zero is not feasible.
The goal now is a 25% drop to 800,000 barrel per day. And that is no joke. It’s a big drop from where Iran was looking to produce in the coming years under the auspice of the JCPOA.
The U.S. will not stop until all avenues have been exhausted or Trump fires his current cabinet.
Iran’s total non-oil exports have suffered as well, since gas condensate exports have also dropped along with the crude oil numbers.
But Iran is finding friends in other places. They are currently finalizing a free trade agreement with the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) with Belarus leading the talks at the 15th meeting between their Joint Economic Committee.
Iran’s non-oil exports, however, are still just one-fifth of their peak exports. Like Russia it is working quickly with regional partners to change that dynamic.
It won’t be enough to overcome the U.S.’s economic pressure in the short term.
But as I always say if it survives the initial onslaught then market forces open up opportunities for change. Things like INSTEX, the EU special purpose vehicle for getting around U.S. sanctions, is a perfect example.
Bilateral trade outside of the U.S. dollar is another.
North-South Trade Routes
The completion of the North South Transport Corridor (NSTC) is also helping. For example, trade turnover between Azerbaijan and Iran rose more than 70% last year.
Speaking in the event, [Azeri Trade Minister] Mustafayev mentioned the 12 meetings between the two countries’ presidents during the past five years and said “that is an indication of how good the relations between the two countries are.”
“In 2018, trade between the two countries increased by 74 percent. Azerbaijan hasn’t had such a boost in trade with any other country.” The official said.
The Azeri minister referred to energy, transportation, industry and tourism as good areas for developing bilateral relations with Iran, and called for Tehran to strengthen relations in these areas.
He further mentioned the friendly relations between his country, Iran and Russia and called for the strengthening of trilateral relationship between Tehran, Baku and Moscow.
Lurking in the background of this meeting is EAEU membership and U.S. influence in Baku. Vladimir Putin, for his part, has been very successful making in-roads with President Ilham Aliyev.
Without that work by Putin the five countries bordering the Caspian Sea wouldn’t have settled on a treaty. This caught the U.S. flat-footed who used Azerbaijan for years to keep the status of the Caspian in flux.
Once Russia relented on a gas pipeline from Turkmenistan through Azerbaijan to Europe things changed. Again, people respond to incentives and new data.
And that bodes well for Iran because it also secures the maritime portion of the NSTC by shoring up, legally, the status of ships crossing Azeri waters between Iran and Russia. It also paves the way for the two countries to develop gas resources jointly.
The North South Transport Corridor is changing the landscape of central Asia. Russian goods no longer have to go by boat all the way around the world to reach Iran and India.
It bypasses important choke points, like the Mediterranean and the Suez.
Most infuriating for Trump, Bolton and the rest of the neocon cretins, it puts Iran at the center of opening up the whole of the Middle East and Central Asia.
Because the NSTC is now active, we’re seeing movement on Eurasian integration which will only accelerate. It is clear Trump is hopeless as a force for change of the traditional U.S. policy of chaos.
Lost in Iraqi Translation
But the bigger news is President Rouhani’s very successful three-day visit to Baghdad last week. Rouhani was hailed as a national hero to the new Iraqi government, a government less in the thrall of its U.S. occupiers.
Rouhani met with every major political and religious figure in Iraq this week. The two countries agreed to new economic projects set to swell bilateral trade to $20 billion from the current $12 billion.
They signed deals to invest in energy as well as increase sales of Iranian gas and electricity to Iraq. The big issue being that Iraq will be a major source of dollars for Iran, still needed as it winds down domestic use of our currency.
These are both very important given the Trump administration’s very public goal of shutting down Iranian oil exports and desire for regime change in Tehran
Iraq is in no mood to knuckle under to Trump and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s bloviating about the evils of Iran.
Remember it was Trump who made a secret visit to Iraq at Christmas and left after three hours because the Iraqi Prime Minister refused to be summoned like some lackey.
According to Elijah Magnier there are two factions now in Iraqi politics.
Iraq today is divided between a large faction of politicians calling for the total withdrawal of US forces from the country, and another which wants to maintain a reduced US force in charge of training and intelligence exchange.
Both factions want to see most US forces leave the country, and can likely reach an agreement on accepting a small specialized force on the ground. The Iraqi government would like to strike a balance and maintain both a fair relationship with the US and excellent ties with Iran.
But a fair relationship with Iraq is not something the U.S. is interested in. There will come a point in the near future when our relationship with Iraq changes dramatically.
Iran and Russia are both playing for time for that to develop.
Lebanese Fire Drill
This is why Mike Pompeo is in Lebanon this week. He will threaten the Lebanese to give up support for Hezbollah or else they will be treated like Iran and Venezuela.
He’s also there to assist war criminal and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu get re-elected next month. How Pompeo is treated by Lebanon will be telling as to where things are headed from here.
I suspect he’ll be treated with the same thinly-veneered disdain that German Chancellor Angela Merkel showed both Pompeo and Vice President Mike Pence at the Munich Security Conference last month.
Lebanon can no more comply with Pompeo’s stated goals of excising Hezbollah from Lebanon’s state affairs then he can distance himself from the siren’s call of a Chinese buffet table.
So, expect after the visit the U.S. follows the U.K. in fully sanctioning Lebanon as a terrorist state, refusing travel, seizing assets. The whole nine yards. All in the name of human rights and fighting terrorism, of course.
Meanwhile, Lebanon is struggling with housing more than 1 million Syrian refugees while the U.S. actively blocks their return home.
Bolton keeps the military situation unsettled and the Treasury Dept. blocks aid through the threat of sanctions helping to rebuild Syria.
It’s like the reverse Marshall Plan. Wage a war on a foreign country. But this time lose and block rebuilding by declaring anyone that does so to be an ‘enemy of peace.’
This heavy-handed strategy is obviously meant as blackmail to accept Jared Kushner’s idiotic, dead-on-arrival but still unveiled peace plan. The goal is advancing greater Israel in the face of massive opposition. It also paves the way for Genie Energy to take the oil and gas under the Golan Heights.
There is a limit to what sanctions and threats can accomplish. And the U.S. is about to find out what that limit is. Chaos only works in the short-term and its expensive.
The costs are written all over the balance sheet of Pax Americana. The moves the U.S. makes today create tomorrow’s headlines. If maintaining this Empire of Chaos, as Pepe Escobar calls it, was so efficient the U.S. wouldn’t be complaining about its cost.
Iran, Russia and China understand this. Arrogant men like Pompeo, Trump and Bolton never will.
Hard info on why the Afghan war has been running for 18 years. Exporting heroin for the CIA.
Benghazi slaughter of the Ambassador sanctioned by Obama and the Pant suit Princess.
15 MIN. VIDEO
A marriage of excellent research and no nonsense language, I think you have found your niche. It help that most of the time you also happen to be right, clearly you’re a Russian bot. : )
He is certainly not wrong about the the priority that the Taliban put on stamping out opium production. Saw the cultivation acreage dramatically increase about two years into the war. However Trump was always pretty anti-drug so I would have expected this out of him. Doesn’t really help me decide if we are in case #3 or case #4.
Not surprised since the San Jose Mercury News broke the story about CIA drug trafficking in 1996 and there had been rumors going back decades before that.
I disagree with the learned gentleman above, Ursel Duran, with respect to the video he provided. Mr. Trump is like a human Rorshach blot – people seem to project their hopes onto him. But he has bent over and grabbed his ankles for the “deep state”, and offered them a tube of K-Y jelly (they are not apparently using the jelly, but HAVE taken him up on his invitation..). Not only did he rollover for them, but he is totally owned by Israel, and to a lesser extent, the GC countries such as Saudi and UAE. This is evident in his horrible neocon cabinet choices, as well as his actions: the Embassy to Jerusalem, the US base now in Israel, the THAAD system now in Israel, the coming attempted illegal giveaway of Syria’s Golan to the Kushner/Cheney/Rothschild/Woolsey cabal known as Genie Energy, the pullout from the JCPOA, treatment of Syria, the genocide in Yemen, etc. In my opinion, people continue to project these qualities onto him due to failure to differentiate between his campaign promises, and his actions as POTUS.
I do, however, agree with the analysis with respect to Afghanistan and Heroin, and all of the last several presidents being mid-level puppets. The last one that wasn’t a total puppet was Nixon, and they Watergated him. Before that JFK, and they killed him. ‘Nuff said there.
Tom, I liked this piece, and have been following your work for several months, having a great respect for your analytical abilities. Thank You.
Bogeyman, Thank you for the feedback and continued support.
I have toying with and idea that no one has spent much time considering. How are the neocons and Trump alike?
Look at the deals that Putin has been putting together. In these deals everyone benefits economically and they have a mutual self interest. At the moment they are insulating themselves from the primary weapon the US uses when military force is not an option which is economic warfare. Like Putin or not but so far I have seen no hint of threats to anyone from Russia without extreme provocation in recent years.
Trump has a mercantilist view of economics and so he regards trade as a zero-sum game. The neocons view foreign policy as a zero-sum game. For both Trump and Bolton the US must win and everyone else must lose. Not a worldview that will influence people in a good way.
It is this difference in attitude and approach that will allow Putin to win and hasten the end of Pax Americana. It is like watching someone who hasn’t mastered checkers, Bolton and merry band of neocons, playing chess against a grand master.
I do regard China as far more likely to be aggressive with their neighbors than Russia simply because their recent actions in the South China Sea. Russia on the other hand has been much more patient even with events in the Ukraine and this will yield Russia much greater gains in the years to come.
You must log in to post a comment.